land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Intake sizing.

To: "Jon.the.Wise" <jon.the.wise@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Intake sizing.
From: Bryan Savage <b.a.savage@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:46:09 -0800
About 30 years ago a guy in L.A., Jerry Branch, said that air flow QUALITY
was more important than quantity. And he proved it repeatedly.

Bryan


Jon.the.Wise wrote:

> But bigger is not always better. If you look at Mitsubishi's 4G63 head
> design, you'll see that the older heads had larger intake ports, but
> the newer heads with slightly smaller ports have a better angle into
> the chamber...
> 
> What happens is that the larger ports can flow more air, but the air
> along the walls of the ports is moving MUCH slower than the air in the
> middle of the port, and then when it hits the absurd angle it must
> take to get into the chamber, that slows things down even more,
> whereas on the smaller ports, the air velocity stays more consistant
> throughout the entire airstream, and has a more gradual angle into the
> chamber...
> 
> Unfortunately, that doesn't really prove a whole lot on it's own, but
> the theory is, you want to be able to size the ports so that they are
> just big enough to flow the air you want to flow, and still small
> enough to flow it with even velocity.
> 
> It sounds like you were aware of this and with the timeframe just went
> for bigger, which *IS* better than too small ;o)






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>