mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 300 miles 70 mph 30 mpg :)

To: Dirk de Boer <deboer@duke.usask.ca>, BLECKSTEIN@SHELL.MONMOUTH.COM
Subject: Re: 300 miles 70 mph 30 mpg :)
From: BLECKSTEIN@SHELL.MONMOUTH.COM
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 18:33:00 -0500

On Wed, 20 Dec 1995, Dirk de Boer <deboer@duke.usask.ca> wrote:
>On Wed, 20 Dec 1995 BLECKSTEIN@SHELL.MONMOUTH.COM wrote:
>
>> >The most important variable would be air resistance.  You would use less
>> >gas per mile at the lower car speed, because the energy needed to overcome
>> >air resistance would be substantially less. 
>> >
>> >   Ray Gibbons  Dept. of Molecular Physiology & Biophysics
>> >                Univ. of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
>> >                gibbons@northpole.med.uvm.edu  (802) 656-8910
>> >
>> >
>> >Just to keep this thing complicated, obviously those west of the 
>Mississippi 
at 
>> higher altitude (thin air) get better mileage. 
>> 
>> Mike Leckstein(looking out the window at our end of fall blizzard.)
>> 
>At high altitudes your mileage may drop because of the decrease in wind 
>resistance in the lower density air, but what is the effect of the lower 
>concentration of oxygen (say in g/l or in g/cubic ft) on engine efficiency?
>
>Dirk
>
>
>I knew we would get into this! 

Mike

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>