mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: lacquer or enamel and why?

To: "Art Pfenninger" <ch155@freenet.buffalo.edu>, <Matt.DeBoer@ejgallo.com>
Subject: Re: lacquer or enamel and why?
From: "Harlan Jillson" <hjillson@argolink.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 17:59:34 -0500
Art,
  When we painted our tri**h a lot of years ago, we used lacquer followed by
clear coat, and it came out great.  But as has been said, I don't think you
can even get lacquer any more, at least not according to the auto paint
supplier near hear.
Harlan.

-----Original Message-----
From: Art Pfenninger <ch155@freenet.buffalo.edu>
To: Matt.DeBoer@ejgallo.com <Matt.DeBoer@ejgallo.com>
Cc: mgs@autox.team.net <mgs@autox.team.net>; Mikecquinn@aol.com
<Mikecquinn@aol.com>
Date: Friday, April 16, 1999 1:28 PM
Subject: RE: lacquer or enamel and why?


>I like the idea of clear coat has anyone else tried it on lacquer? It
>would be especially helpful in areas that are hard to buff such as the
>engine bay or door edges.
>...Art
>
>On Fri, 16 Apr 1999 Matt.DeBoer@ejgallo.com wrote:
>
>> If the clear coat goes on well (good flow, no hint of orange peel),
buffing
>> will give provide a glassy finish.  If not, a light sanding before
buffing
>> will get you a lot closer to the smooth finish.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> >I'm not sure about the clear coat but I would think
>>  > that it wouldn't have to be buffed, after all they don't buff new cars
>>  > with a clear coat finish.
>>
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>