mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: lacquer or enamel and why?

To: Harlan Jillson <hjillson@argolink.net>
Subject: Re: lacquer or enamel and why?
From: Susan and John Roper <vscjohn@huntnet.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 21:16:30 -0500
Look faor another paint store.  Lacquer is still available.  John

Harlan Jillson wrote:

> Art,
>   When we painted our tri**h a lot of years ago, we used lacquer followed by
> clear coat, and it came out great.  But as has been said, I don't think you
> can even get lacquer any more, at least not according to the auto paint
> supplier near hear.
> Harlan.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Art Pfenninger <ch155@freenet.buffalo.edu>
> To: Matt.DeBoer@ejgallo.com <Matt.DeBoer@ejgallo.com>
> Cc: mgs@autox.team.net <mgs@autox.team.net>; Mikecquinn@aol.com
> <Mikecquinn@aol.com>
> Date: Friday, April 16, 1999 1:28 PM
> Subject: RE: lacquer or enamel and why?
>
> >I like the idea of clear coat has anyone else tried it on lacquer? It
> >would be especially helpful in areas that are hard to buff such as the
> >engine bay or door edges.
> >...Art
> >
> >On Fri, 16 Apr 1999 Matt.DeBoer@ejgallo.com wrote:
> >
> >> If the clear coat goes on well (good flow, no hint of orange peel),
> buffing
> >> will give provide a glassy finish.  If not, a light sanding before
> buffing
> >> will get you a lot closer to the smooth finish.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Matt
> >>
> >> >I'm not sure about the clear coat but I would think
> >>  > that it wouldn't have to be buffed, after all they don't buff new cars
> >>  > with a clear coat finish.
> >>
> >
> >




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>