mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Starter

To: <WSpohn4@aol.com>
Subject: Re: Starter
From: "Lawrie Alexander" <Lawrie@britcars.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 07:06:59 -0700
Oops, did I misread your first note? I thought you were comparing the
pre-engaged starter to the earlier starter. Should I have read it to mean
that you were comparing two different types of pre-engaged starter? (I guess
we English have a hard time reading Canadian!)

Lawrie

-----Original Message-----
From: WSpohn4@aol.com <WSpohn4@aol.com>
To: Lawrie@britcars.com <Lawrie@britcars.com>
Cc: mgs@autox.team.net <mgs@autox.team.net>
Date: Wednesday, May 19, 1999 11:23 PM
Subject: Re: Starter


>In a message dated 5/19/99 9:13:43 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
>Lawrie@britcars.com writes:
>
><< Could the perception of more power from the starter motor be a result of
>the
> later starter engaging with a ring gear that is 3/4" larger in diameter?
> That would change the gearing between the starter and flywheel, thus also
> affecting the ease with which it turns the engine.
>  >>
>
>As it engages with the stock ring gear, I don't think this applies.
>
>Bill
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>