mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Setting fire to three SUVs

To: "David Breneman" <idcb@airborne.com>
Subject: Re: Setting fire to three SUVs
From: Bill Saidel <saidel@camden.rutgers.edu>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 15:41:04 -0400
I sure hope you're joking David. I cannot tell. No one in their right mind
would ever consider your comment anything other than a Bill Mahr type joke.
 People, including myself, hate being in an MG and have an SUV  tail gate.
I hate being in my family car and being tail gated by an SUV. Around here
on the moderate roads and highways (East Coast), SUV drivers are rude,
obnoxious, and overly aggressive. 

MG and other LBC cars are anything but that.  Attacking SUV's is not a
Luddite activity. It is, in many cases, maybe not the particular that
started this thread, a mode of self-preservation.

And besides, the law and its sentences are often crazy. More years for
destroying 3 vehicles than manslaughter.  That is just bizarre.

Bill Saidel
'76B


At 12:18 PM 7/22/2003 -0700, you wrote:
>Rocky Frisco SEZ -
>> 
>> I tend to agree, but I think the sentence WAS a bit excessive, 
>> considering he only killed three of the big ugly rolling road-hogs. If 
>> it had been three MGs, I reckon he should get the death penalty.  ;)
>
>Amen!  But if vandals can attack SUVs because they're "too big" they
>can sure attack MGs because they're "too fun."  I don't think these
>luddites will be happy until everybody's forced to use mass transit
>and the private ownership of cars is severly curtailed if not banned
>outright.  After all, if you can go see an MG in a museum, why do
>you need to own one?
>
>-- 
>David Breneman                     | "I don't care to belong to a club
>Distributed Systems S/W Analyst    |  that accepts people like me
>Airborne Express, Inc.             |  as members."
>david.breneman@airborne.com        |                 - Groucho Marx

///  or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>