Dean T. Lake wrote:
> Paul, you mention the 318ti - it was coincidentally the car that I was
> pondering to complement my B roadster when I decided to simply combine
> the two concepts and get a GT. The ti is such a practical, yet neat
> little car. The big strike against it from my perspective (besides BMW
> pricing) was that it needed the straight six (which they could get in
> Europe) to go with the some 2800 pounds.
The big problem, apart from the excessive weight of the 318ti is/was
that American drivers are too lazy to drive a car. The expect instant
gratification and are completely unwilling to take any responsibility.
Drivers need to get back to driving their cars instead of being a
passenger that happens to have a steering wheel in front of them.
Auto journalists can be partly blamed with things like, "wow, this
is a great car, except, with only 600HP it's not as snappy as it could
be. We need the 800HP engine in it." Ok, maybe no one wrote that, but
words to that effect. Peter Egan was the only writer I saw that said
that the 1.8l in the Z3 was a good choice, if you actually drove the
car.
Though one magazine did say that the best balance in the new Mazda6 was
the 4 cylinder with the 5 speed. That's an exception.
I can out accellerate most drivers on the road with my 626 with 110HP or
so, and something wrong in the dizzy/coil that loads up at 4000. And of
course, in my B. Because I plan ahead.
And no, I'm not a great driver. I'm an average driver. As was shown in
the Mazda Rev-it-up series over the summer. I guess I get a bit better
as I get more time in a car
We don't need bigger engines, we need brains that are actually on while
driving.
Paul.
|