| To: | "Councill, David" <dcouncill@msubillings.edu> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Brake Trouble! UPDATE! | 
| From: | Charles & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com> | 
| Date: | Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:46:22 -0500 | 
|    Darn, I didn't think of the earlier Bs.  OK guys, I sit corrected.
   Thanks,
    CR
Councill, David wrote:
> I thought the reason for the dual master cylinder was redundancy so that
> a rear or front brake failure would not end in total brake failure. This
> was a USA mandated safety standard. Mk1 Bs had a single master cylinder.
 | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Brake trouble, mghirsch | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Brake Trouble! UPDATE!, Hans Duinhoven | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Brake Trouble! UPDATE!, Paul Hunt | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: Brake Trouble! UPDATE!, yd3 | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |