-- [ From: Bob Nogueira * EMC.Ver #3.1a ] --
Chip
Your right about it being interesting and not full of legalese. This is the
second British legal opinion that I've read that was in many ways more
interesting than many magazine articles .
The other one I read was
HUBBARD vs. MIDDLEBRIDGE SCIMITAR LIMITED.
Seems a guy contracted to buy a Bentley ( Old Number One ) and found that
over the years every part of the car had been replaced and none of the car
he was to buy was the original Old Number One . The seller sued for breach
of contract when the buyer backed out . The Courts finding reads like a
history written by Richard Langworth .
If you'd like, I can e-mail you a copy ( 77592 bytes)
Bob Nogueira
-------- REPLY, Original message follows --------
> Subject: Re: More about MSCC vs Christine Healey
>
> Those of you who are MSCC members should read this brief, which to this
> non-lawyer American's sensibilities is an interesting document indeed. It
isn't
> full of legalese, reads like it was written by nonlawyers. Print it out
and
> take a quiet minute to read it. It will be worth your while.
> ,
> Ernest W. (Chip) Brown
> Norwalk, Connecticut, USA
>
-------- REPLY, End of original message --------
|