morgans
[Top] [All Lists]

[Fwd: Spindles]

To: "Morgans@Autox.Team.Net" <Morgans@autox.team.net>
Subject: [Fwd: Spindles]
From: "Ernest(Chip) Brown" <Chip.Brown@msdw.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 19:11:16 -0500
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------ED02B3356E4A49756B12F08E

Hey, guys. It is time for you all to weigh in here. I don't remember the
particulars about the different spindles, but we've been through this
conversation before, with respect to my car. Chip B.

--------------ED02B3356E4A49756B12F08E
Content-Disposition: inline

Return-Path: <morgans-owner@autox.team.net>
Received: from samail1.ms.com (samail1.morgan.com [144.14.9.149])
        by hqsmh2.ms.com (8.8.5/imap+ldap v2.4) with ESMTP id JAA03803
        for <ebrown@hqsmh2>; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 09:02:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from root@localhost)
        by samail1.ms.com (8.8.5/hub+ldap v2.4) with X.500 id JAA12617
        for ebrown@hqsmh2.ms.com; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 09:02:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from hqvsbh1.ms.com (hqvsbh1-i0.morgan.com [199.89.99.101])
        by samail1.ms.com (8.8.5/hub+ldap v2.4) with ESMTP id JAA12594
        for <ebrown@ms.com>; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 09:02:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from uucp@localhost)
        by hqvsbh1.ms.com (8.9.3/fw v1.30) id JAA03912
        for <ebrown@ms.com>; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 09:02:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost(127.0.0.1) by hqvsbh1 via smap (4.1)
        id sma.9458713561.003026; Wed, 22 Dec 99 09:02:36 -0500
Received: (from uucp@localhost)
        by hqvsbh1.ms.com (8.9.3/8.9.3(vsin)) id JAA03017
        for <ebrown@ms.com>; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 09:02:36 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: hqvsbh1.ms.com: Processed from queue 
/var/spool/mqueue-vsin
X-Authentication-Warning: hqvsbh1.ms.com: Processed by uucp with -C 
/etc/mail/sendmail.vsin.cf
Received: from triumph.cs.utah.edu(155.99.188.52) by hqvsbh1 via smap (4.1)
        id sma.9458713461.002866; Wed, 22 Dec 99 09:02:26 -0500
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
        by triumph.cs.utah.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id HAA08066
        for morgans-actors; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 07:02:21 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <000b01bf4c84$2de464c0$127de8d0@oemcomputer>
From: "Greg Solow" <gregmogdoc@surfnetusa.com>
To: <DGreimel@aol.com>, <Chip.Brown@msdw.com>, <morgans@autox.team.net>
References: <0.54e9da66.25922543@aol.com>
Subject: Re: Spindles
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 05:55:16 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
        charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Sender: owner-morgans@autox.team.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Greg Solow" <gregmogdoc@surfnetusa.com>

Plus Eight and heavy duty +4 spindles have stub axles that are the same size
as one another.  They are both 3/4 inch in diameter at their outer ends and
larger at the inner bearing.  Regular +4 and 4/4 spindles are 5/8 inch in
diameter at their outer ends and are smaller than the +8 parts at their
inner ends also.  They are substantially weaker then the largercomponents.
                                                                Regards,
Greg Solow
----- Original Message -----
From: <DGreimel@aol.com>
To: <Chip.Brown@msdw.com>; <morgans@autox.team.net>
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 1999 4:59 AM
Subject: Re: Spindles


> That is what I wanted to know.  Now the quesion is - what makes them heavy
> duty if they are the same size?
> Thanks
> Don
>


--------------ED02B3356E4A49756B12F08E--


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Fwd: Spindles], Ernest(Chip) Brown <=