oletrucks
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [oletrucks] More sandblasting questions.

To: oletrucks@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [oletrucks] More sandblasting questions.
From: "Jeff Davis" <jsd51@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 18:53:18 PST
Mark,

     Instead of moisture being your problem it's probably the fact that your 
using a suction sandblaster. Save your $75.00 on the filter and put it 
towards a pressurized blaster. Even the worst pressurized blaster is better 
than the best suction blaster. Just my .02

Jeff Davis
'51 custom



>From: "Mark Self" <markself@discover.net>
>Reply-To: "Mark Self" <markself@discover.net>
>To: "G. Simmons" <gls@4link.net>, "Oletrucks list" 
><oletrucks@autox.team.net>
>Subject: Re: [oletrucks] More sandblasting questions.
>Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 06:51:28 -0800
>
>Grant:
>     Thanks for the baking soda idea.  I have heard of it, but didn't have
>any feedback from anyone.
>     I have a 6 hp 60 gal. 10.2 cfm Campbell Hausfeld compressor.  I'm 
>using
>a BarrelBlaster sandblasting cabinet (suction type).  I've used common 
>sand,
>Sarblast from DuPont and glass beads.  This combination is so slow as to be
>nearly worthless.  I talked to the BarrelBlaster people and they sent me a
>new gun and a clear pickup line.  You can see the glass beads coming up the
>pickup line, but it still is so slow that the only thing that seemed left 
>to
>do was to try a filter.  Next thing will be the coalescing filter and that
>is like $75.00!
>     In the TIP  catalog it show pictures of pieces (carbs and water pumps)
>that have been sandblasted for 10-15 min. and are bright shiny metal ready
>to be painted.  This is the kind of performance that i expected.  Is this
>unrealistic?  I've yet been able to take anything down to bright shiny
>metal.
>
>Mark Self
>Redlands, CA
>'55 1st 5-window 3100
>"Sentimental Journey"
>-----Original Message-----
>From: G. Simmons <gls@4link.net>
>To: Mark Self <markself@discover.net>; Oletrucks list
><oletrucks@autox.team.net>
>Date: Tuesday, November 30, 1999 8:58 PM
>Subject: Re: [oletrucks] More sandblasting questions.
>
>
> >Hi Mark:
> >
> >I'm in the San Fernando Valley, and I don't have any moisture problems 
>with
> >sandblasting.   My compressor lines sometimes generate a little
> >condensation, but the garden variety in-line water trap seems to take 
>care
> >of it.  Are you using pressure or suction?
> >
> >I have found that a lot of my light sandblasting jobs work quite well 
>with
> >baking soda.  Baking soda disappears with a little hosing and is much 
>more
> >pleasant to use than beads or sand.  You're not chewing and blinking it 
>for
> >days, and it washes right out of your hair.  For little jobs, you can buy 
>a
> >quart of it at Smart & Final, pull the lid off and stick your suction end
> >right in the jar.  You can also buy 50 lb bags from chemical suppliers in
> >various grades of coarseness.
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Grant S. gls@4link.net
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Mark Self <markself@discover.net>
> >To: Oletrucks list <oletrucks@autox.team.net>
> >Date: Monday, November 29, 1999 7:22 AM
> >Subject: [oletrucks] More sandblasting questions.
> >
> >
> >>Hey guys:
> >>    Here in So Cal the humidity seems to run about 30-50%..  Will the
> >>standard water traps take care of the moisture in the
> >compressor/sandblaster
> >>system, or do I need a coalescent filter or both?
> >>    Thamnks
> >>Mark Self
> >>Redlands, CA
> >>'55 1st 5-window 3100
> >>"Sentimental Journey"
> >>
> >>oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
> >>
> >
> >oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
> >
>
>oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959

oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>