spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Spridget Frame Data Sheets

To: <Daniel1312@aol.com>, <richard.arnold@juno.com>, <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Spridget Frame Data Sheets
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 17:18:38 -0500charset="iso-8859-1"
References: <a2.72a57c8.26a23d30@aol.com>
Daniel,

"There's cheaters and there's losers... and 2nd place is just the first
loser"... they say...

(Find any cheatin' dog parts on the Dead Rat Bastard and you can buy it for
$3... but these days you're definately overpaying...)

WST
----- Original Message -----
From <Daniel1312 at aol.com>
To: <richard.arnold@juno.com>; <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2000 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: Spridget Frame Data Sheets


> In a message dated 15/07/00 05:00:48 GMT Daylight Time,
> Hi list,
>
> On this subject anyone know if the RB cars had exactly the same H section
> part of the front chassis as the other cars did.  I have heard that there
is
> a subtle difference that can result in better handling than the earlier
cars
> (if all things were equal and obviously they are not).  I have even heard
> rumours of some European racers transplanting this section of the chassis
to
> Bugeyes to gain an unfair and possibly illegal advantage.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Daniel1312
>
> richard.arnold@juno.com writes:
>
> << I have the data sheets for the RB cars, and for the quarter-elliptic
>  spring cars.  For some reason, I'm thinking that the RB cars used the
>  same platform as the earlier models, with a change in the width between
>  the frame rails.  Is this correct?  And, if so, could we simply take
>  (good / precise) measurements from an unspoiled earlier model, and
>  annotate a later model data sheet?  Noting, of course, the difference in
>  ride heights? >>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>