autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: air dam, legal?

To: "Jeff Lloyd" <jslz3@hotmail.com>, <autox@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: air dam, legal?
From: "Justin Hughes" <ka1ult@channel1.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 09:48:08 -0500
> I need a rule book lawyer for this one,

You'll have to settle for me. :)

> Due to a unfortunate mishap with a deer,
> I am replacing the front air dam on My B-stock Z3 1.9

Ugh - sorry to hear it, but glad you're OK.

> The factory Replacement unit is available but a tad bit pricy, I have
> scoured the junkyards to no avail..

Well, that's a BMW for ya (hey, my 320i ain't cheap either)

> I have found 3 options but I don't want to risk a possible rule
> infringement...
>
> 1. aftermarket (non factory) replacement part.
> 2. a unit from a later model (slightly different style)
> 3. a stylized model from a aftermarket tuning house
> 4. a junkyard unit from a 6 cyl model?

Uh, that's 4 options, dude... :)

> which one of these are STOCK legal? or do I just have to dish out the cash
> to get the factory replacement piece,

We discussed something similar back with Miatas, and then earlier Saturn
coupes, which have different nosepieces between earlier and later models.
The consensus was that since these parts don't give you any kind of
performance advantage it shouldn't be a problem.  Running stock-illegal
ducting to holes or vents present in the different piece would be, well,
stock illegal, but the part itself is OK.  As for the airdam, I doubt the
more aggressive looking piece from an M Roadster is going to give your Z3
1.9 a handling advantage at autox speeds.  But it would look cool. ;)

Just my 02¢ - I'd still suggest getting a real "rules lawyer's" opinion
before proceeding.

    - Justin
      95 SC2 "Locutus"
      83 320i "Igor"




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>