-----Original Message-----
From: dave2020@mindspring.com <dave2020@mindspring.com>
To: Phil Ethier <pethier@isd.net>
Cc: dave2020@mindspring.com <dave2020@mindspring.com>; autox@autox.team.net
<autox@autox.team.net>; evolution-discussions@yahoogroups.com
<evolution-discussions@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Friday, March 01, 2002 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Rules Clarification / Protest Bait
>> If the factory says this is the official stock part for this car,
>> it is the official stock part for the car.
>
>Even if it has a signifigant performance gain over the pistons that came in
the car?
You see an exception for that in the rule book?
>> I never heard of the "stock Compression Ratio Statute". Do you
>> have a Solo2 rule to quote on this?
>
>I was under the impression that we had a way of testing the CR though, and
that it would be required to match what is written in the factory manual. I
guess that is the real issue - Which is God, current parts or the manual
that was written 10 years ago.
Unless somebody shows me different, I will continue to believe that it is
parts that are regulated by the book, not performance.
Phil Ethier West Side Saint Paul Minnesota USA
1970 Lotus Europa, 1992 Saturn SL2, 1986 Suburban, 1962 Triumph TR4 CT2846L
pethier@isd.net http://www.mnautox.com/ http://www.vtr2002.org
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive
|