> The only request for member input on stock shocks I could find was in the
> April 2000 issue.
> It states: "It has been suggested that the SB consider disallowing triple
> and quadruple adjustable shock absorbers in Stock and the Board is seeking
> member input regarding this issue. Interested members should provide
> feedback in writing by 5/19/00."
> There does not appear to be any requests for member input on the subject of
> remote reservoirs.
Somebody just privately emailed the snip shown above to me. It would appear
I was ... <gasp> ... WRONG / INCORRECT / TALKING OUT MY BUTT (take your pick)
when I replied to Mark Chiles that there was a request for member input on
allowing remote reservoir shocks in Stock. Now I'm really confused, because
I know I addressed the topic of remote reservoirs in my letter to the SEB.
Specifically, my comments at the time were they should only be allowed on
vehicles which were originally supplied by the factory with remote reservoir
shocks (I did not have the same level of understanding regarding remote
reservoirs as today).
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to firstname.lastname@example.org or try
/// Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive