Quinn, Patrick wrote:
> G'day Kent
> Why anyone would want to turn a well running BN2 into a cantankerous
> BN3 is quite beyond me.
You're making a huge assumption that my BN2 is a well running example.
It hasn't run since I bought it in 1974. It's missing the floors, the
bottom 6" of the doors, most of the interior bits, and who knows what
else. But it's mine. :-)
Perhaps you missed my summation of the matter:
> Nah.
In US English, that's "No." As in, that would be way beyond the scope
of my talents.
But thanks for pointing out some of the challenges DMH faced when
he built the first one.
Kindest regards,
--
Kent McLean
'56 100 BN2
|