Hmmmmmm... I'll give you the nod on the tail-lights, but I'm still an
avowed 1500 guy myself: (see for yourself...)
http://www.jacksonville.net/~suchak/toys.htm
:^)
JS
(PS, *damn* nice job on that Mk3, but you put the steering wheel in on
the wrong side! Must be a bugger at the McDonalds drive-through! ;^)
Sebastian_King@ipc.co.uk wrote:
>
> MKIII - definately the best looking
>
> http://www.sebking.demon.co.uk/triumph.htm
>
> Subject: Re: WARNING! SPITFIRE VIRUS
> From: John Suchak <suchak@mediaone.net> at INTERNET
> Date: 16/4/99 8:43 am
>
> Hey James:
>
> I'm building a '74 Spit, I'm curious why you like the '79's
> specifically.. Most people I've met tend to prefer the earlier cars in
> the squaretail series because of the steel bumpers and lack of emissions
> equipment (consequently more HP and less hassle).
>
> I always thought that bumpers, smog stuff and the lay down radiator were
> the only differences. Is there something else that I don't know about?
> (like bigger brakes or better suspension or something?)
>
> Enlighten me!
>
> John
>
> Metallian6@aol.com wrote:
> >
> > The '79 Spitfires are more infected than all the other Spitfires. If you
> > should happen to see one step back and run away. Then call me. Hehehehehe
> > I'll take it home for further study. ;-)
> >
> > James
> > Still looking in North Florida area for a '79 Spitfire.
|