[Top] [All Lists]

Re: rover

To: "Bowen, Patrick A RP2" <PABowen@sar.med.navy.mil>
Subject: Re: rover
From: "Graham Stretch" <technical@iwnet.screaming.net>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 10:47:46 +0100
Hi Patrick
My feeling on this one is that the world wide replacement  name for the
saloon car range to avoid using the now fairly tarnished Rover name would be
Triumph which BMW have, and as we all know everything has a price! This
would help to recoup losses BMW have incurred with the rover giveaway, after
all 10:00 is not a lot of change from the millions that were given with

Sprinted Dolomite
2000 MKI
Toledo 1300
1300 front wheel drive

----- Original Message -----
From: Bowen, Patrick A RP2 <PABowen@sar.med.navy.mil>
To: 'John Cave' <cavej@mcmaster.ca>; Spitfire List
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2000 7:46 PM
Subject: RE: rover

> Someone give me the collective logic on why BMW would not give up the
> Triumph Marque or Riley (not that I know that one).  Could it be that BMW
> forsees a future for Triumph with them??   Can we hope?  Logic anyone.
> Patrick
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Cave [mailto:cavej@mcmaster.ca]
> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2000 1:14 PM
> To: Spitfire List
> Subject: rover
> Been away so you may already be aware of this Rover group has been
> bought by Phoenix Plc from B.M.W. the only old English
> names B.M.W. would not give up were TRIUMPH and RILEY.
>                         Regards John Cave
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This email server is running an evaluation copy of the MailShield anti-
> spam software. Please contact your email administrator if you have any
> questions about this message. MailShield product info: www.mailshield.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>