>Thanks again for the info Keith.
You're welcome.
>The engine is not a fwd, however, it is definitely a normal rwd. First
of
>all the starter was shere it should be, secondly the gearbox is a rwd
>gearbox, thirdly the oil sump was "normal" and lastly it was in a Bond.
Sounds like someone has already changed all the bits necessary to convert
it to rear wheel drive spec.
>And what makes it even more strange is that it is identical to a
Spitfire
>engine, despite the WB-id.
>I was thinking of putting it in my Spit 1500. So what do you all think?
>Weird?
The Bonds were all 1300s and I'm not sure if the gearbox splines are the
same as the spit 1500. You may need to change the flywheel and clutch
over. Apart from that it should be pretty much the same as a 1500 spit
engine although the camshaft and compression ratio may be different.
Keith Bennett Keith.Bennett@bbc.co.uk
___ ___
|HH\__/ ||
|HHHH|||||
S T A N D A R D |HHHH||||| T R I U M P H
__|HHHH|||||___
| \__H|__/ HHH
\______HHHHHHH/
|