triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Environment and LBC's - A sort of screed

To: ecopaige@metro.net, triumphs@Autox.Team.Net
Subject: Re: Environment and LBC's - A sort of screed
From: Lftlesl@aol.com
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 1997 12:50:34 -0400 (EDT)
In a message dated 97-08-06 14:28:58 EDT, ecopaige@metro.net (Dean C. Paige)
writes:

<< As a former Environmental Regulator (Industrial Waste Control) and as a 
 present regulatee  (Environmental Compliance Officer, City of Santa Rosa 
 - I try to make sure no one in our organization goes to jail for 
 violation of enviro regs) I have followed the environmental regulations 
 related threads with interest. I was trained as an Environmental 
 Biologist at UC Santa Barbara and in my informed opinion the Ozone Layer 
 question is far from resolved. Both sides have presented cogent 
 arguments. But planetary and atmospheric sciences are fledgelings. At 
 this point I'd rather err on the side of caution. I humbly submit that 
 those of you who have disdain for the environmental regs in the U.S. 
 might consider the alternatives.
 
 Prior to the Clean Water and Clean Air Acts (CWA, CAA) we were headed for 
 real trouble. Most major rivers were unfit for recreational use including 
 swimming, fishing and boating; some were so bad that there were literally 
 no fish left alive, at least one would spontaneously burst into flames.  
 There were no controls on auto exhast or industry air pollution 
 emissions, major sections of industrialized states were choked with smog 
 and the quality of everyones health suffered. 
 
 In the 25 years since the enactment of these landmark regulations things 
 are improved considerably. New cars, if properly maintained, emit less 
 than a 50th of the Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) as unequipped cars. 
 Smokestack emissions have been drastically reduced. Our rivers, streams 
 and lakes are cleaner than they have been since the industrial 
 revolution. We and our children will lead healthier lives because of the 
 efforts of U.S environmentalists. 
 
 Sure, sometimes the so called environmentalists go too far (there are 
 radicals and nuts in any movement). Some bogus legislation gets through, 
 some junk science is held by the naive as gospel, but most of us are 
 dedicated to insuring the health of ouselves, our communities and our 
 planet. 
 
 Want to see what happens without controls; travel in industrialized areas 
 of Mexico or for the worst horrors imaginable the industrial centers of 
 the former USSR where in the entire industrial age no thought was given 
 to the results of environmental disregard. See a sulfuric acid factory in 
 Poland where nothing grows in 10 km radius, witness Chernobel and a rich 
 agricutural landscape abandoned because of radiation.
 
 The world looks to three Countries for environmental solutions - the 
 U.S., Canada, and the Netherlands. Why? Because the rest of the world 
 notes that we are the best at developing the technology to provide for a 
 healthy environment and also that in spite of making huge expenditures in 
 the area we are still the most prosperous countries in the world. The 
 movement has created tens of thousands of jobs, immensely increased 
 technological and scientific knowledge and most importantly provided a 
 more healthful environment. And lets remember when we bash any particular 
 administration that the movement has had bi-partisan support 
 historically. A republican adminsitration enacted the CWA and CAA.
 
 I know smog laws are a pain in the ass. But keep in mind that most of our 
 classic cars are not held to the same standard as a new vehicle. The 
 standards were set for these vehicles based on the technology available 
 at the time of manufacture. A well maintained pre-pollution control auto 
 will pass smog. My TR-6 has every two years since I moved to CA in 1976. 
 And those of us who drive LBCs are fortunate. Parts for most of our cars 
 are redably available. Try getting parts for an American car thats 25 
 years old. We've got Moss, Rimmer, TRV, VB and on and on.
 
 I have a long standing relationship with my TR-6 (I know that sounds a 
 little strange). My part of the relationship is that I treat her with 
 respect and that means doing everything I can to keep her running to the 
 best of my ability and so that she has as minimal an effect on the 
 environment as possible considering her design and age. Her part is that 
 she provides me with a sense of accomplishment and the priveledge of 
 driving a truly distinctive, personality laden machine that just makes me 
 feel good and not incidentally attracts a lot of attention. It's been a 
 successful relationship for 25 years. Something has to be right. 
 
 I'm done now, had to get it off my chest. All I ask is that you think 
 about it.
 
 Deano
  >>
Amen and thank you.
Les Landon

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: Environment and LBC's - A sort of screed, Lftlesl <=