triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: FW: Cylinder head thickness vs. comp ratio

To: "'Joe Curry'" <spitlist@gte.net>
Subject: RE: FW: Cylinder head thickness vs. comp ratio
From: "Hugh Fader" <hfader@usa.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 21:46:09 -0500
Cc: "'Triumph Mailing List \(E-mail\)'" <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Hi Joe.

I think Ted said he added 3 cc for the head gasket. Eyebrows on the piston
and such would be included in his cylinder volume measurement, but not his
combustion chamber measurement.

The way my calculation works these things are already factored in. Provided
that Triumph gave us an accurate initial compression ratio number. That
doesn't mean it's better, because there are other assumptions and estimates
involved.

For those that asked, I am just about to send out the spreadsheet that I
promised.

Regards,
Hugh Fader

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-triumphs@autox.team.net
> [mailto:owner-triumphs@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of Joe Curry
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:31 PM
> To: Hugh Fader
> Cc: Triumph Mailing List (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: FW: Cylinder head thickness vs. comp ratio
>
>
> Hugh Fader wrote:
> >
> > Here are words of wisdom from Ted Schmacher. I am
> forwarding this because it
> > got to me but not the list.
>
>
> The only things that Ted left out is compensation for
> thickness of the head gasket and the amount the piston sticks
> out of or rests below the surface
> of the deck.  These two factors affect the volume of the
> cylinder in both the down stroke and the upstroke.
>
> Joe

///  triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list
///  To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
///  with nothing in it but
///
///     unsubscribe triumphs
///
///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>