Mail Archive Search: <+from:Josef.Eckert@t-systems.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:Josef.Eckert@t-systems.com: 277 ]

Total 277 documents matching your query.

201. Re: [Healeys] Questin to Trim (Concours) (score: 1): Author: <Josef.Eckert@t-systems.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 15:10:10 +0200; Many thanks for your detailed answer. Only your answer gives me more questions. When I restore a car and reassemble it as nice as possible, lets say to make a Show Car, I would go to better quality; /html/healeys/2010-09/msg00715.html (10,443 bytes)
202. [Healeys] Questin to Trim (Concours) (score: 1): Author: <Josef.Eckert@t-systems.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 22:34:56 +0200; I have no complains to judging as you do. I also would give a car full points which is as close as possible to factory spec, except panel allignment is far from what I think is achievable by a good; /html/healeys/2010-09/msg00720.html (10,073 bytes)
203. Re: [Healeys] Engines (score: 1): Author: <Josef.Eckert@t-systems.com>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 09:30:55 +0200; I would not mind to drop the Ferrari part. The only classic car I would buy of the FIAT-Ferrari name would be the FIAT "Otto Vu", which by the way was far superior to any stock Austin-Healey. And ha; /html/healeys/2010-09/msg00771.html (7,801 bytes)
204. [Healeys] Bonnet Louver follow-up and a (3rd) question (score: 1): Author: <Josef.Eckert@t-systems.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 14:20:33 +0200; Oh, there were many club racers ( competition Austin Healey 100/6s and 3000s) around with louvered bonnets in the 70s and early 80s. That was needed, as the surviving engines were a bit over their be; /html/healeys/2010-10/msg00271.html (8,636 bytes)
205. [Healeys] Austin Healey Radio? (score: 1): Author: <Josef.Eckert@t-systems.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:38:13 +0200; Most radios for Austin-Healeys were dealer options, especially for cars delivered to the US. When talking about factory radios, the BJ8 was fitted with different models of Smiths Radiomobile radios f; /html/healeys/2010-10/msg00629.html (8,568 bytes)
206. Re: [Healeys] Brake line material (score: 1): Author: <Josef.Eckert@t-systems.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:29:37 +0200; For me I do not understand why anyone does the hassle with stainless steel brake lines. The Cunifer (Kunifer) ones are so easy to work with and have no disadvantage to stainless steel. I even use cop; /html/healeys/2010-10/msg00801.html (8,355 bytes)
207. Re: [Healeys] BJ8 rear lights (score: 1): Author: <Josef.Eckert@t-systems.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 20:48:42 +0100; I need to check, but I think there was such version of the BJ8 Phase1 with amber direction indicators instead of the usual reflectors for specific European countries. These cars got separate reflecto; /html/healeys/2010-11/msg00593.html (7,542 bytes)
208. [Healeys] 100/6 engines with prefix 26C (score: 1): Author: <Josef.Eckert@t-systems.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 09:36:27 +0100; Here`s a question to the 100/6 experts. Some 100/6 cars were fitted with engines prefix 26C, not 1C-H or 26D. Does anyone know about them. We have about 10 on the UK register and we couldn`t find any; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00071.html (6,950 bytes)
209. [Healeys] Hardtop listed on Heritage Cert. cert? (score: 1): Author: <Josef.Eckert@t-systems.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 13:13:51 +0100; In the production records factory hardtops are only listed as one of the extras without any serial number. As far as I remember there is just a mark "HT" in the production book for the specific car.; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00074.html (9,131 bytes)
210. [Healeys] nos headlight ring (score: 1): Author: <Josef.Eckert@t-systems.com>; Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 09:45:35 +0100; Its better to look for two similar ones, as also original rims differ. When they are from lets say an early 100/6 they are really much different in shape to BJ8 ones. You see it, when you put two to; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00092.html (8,560 bytes)
211. Re: [Healeys] boot lid fit (score: 1): Author: <Josef.Eckert@t-systems.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 20:24:57 +0100; Its sounds stupid, but have you put the rh hinge to lh side and lh hinge to rh Not sure if that would work anyway. Josef Eckert Konigswinter/Germany --Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-- Von: healeys-bounces@a; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00128.html (9,901 bytes)
212. [Healeys] Oil in the water cooling system (score: 1): Author: <Josef.Eckert@t-systems.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:06:18 +0100; Who knows anything about this oil gallery repair kit as sold by SC Parts, see No 85 and perhaps other suppliers: http://www.scparts.co.uk/index/lang-2/lkz-195/markenid-1/katnr-1/kat_sprache2/hrubnr-2; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00229.html (10,074 bytes)
213. Re: [Healeys] rear shocks (score: 1): Author: <Josef.Eckert@t-systems.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:04:35 +0100; I can highly recommend Apple Hydraulics. I send all front shocks to them and they come back like new. The only thing you need to change are the bolts for the back plates. The shocks come back with h; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00313.html (8,142 bytes)
214. Re: [Healeys] rear shocks (score: 1): Author: <Josef.Eckert@t-systems.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:12:20 +0100; I just saw on the World Wide Auto Parts wep page the change in fitting of the front shocks from No RM6075 to No RM8002 was inn 1961/62. So my question: Which is the right shock for a 1962 BT7 Tricarb; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00337.html (8,859 bytes)
215. [Healeys] WG: rear shocks (score: 1): Author: <Josef.Eckert@t-systems.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:13:46 +0100; I just saw on the World Wide Auto Parts wep page the change in fitting of the front shocks from No RM6075 to No RM8002 was inn 1961/62. So my question: Which is the right shock for a 1962 BT7 Tricarb; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00338.html (7,398 bytes)
216. Re: [Healeys] WG: rear shocks (score: 1): Author: <Josef.Eckert@t-systems.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:32:39 +0100; Many thanks, that`s very helpful. World Wide Auto Parts catalog says RM6075 up to the year 1961. That may mean not to the end of BT7/BN7 Production. Their catalog also says RM8002 starts with BJ7, w; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00340.html (9,077 bytes)
217. Re: [Healeys] 2.6 engine rebuild (score: 1): Author: <Josef.Eckert@t-systems.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:59:59 +0100; Hi Gergo, Congratulations, it seems you have found your engine. Which head do you use now, two or six port? You also need the right carbs + inlet manifold for your 100/6. AH Spares is about an hour`s; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00451.html (8,283 bytes)
218. [Healeys] WG: 2.6 engine rebuild (score: 1): Author: <Josef.Eckert@t-systems.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:53:17 +0100; Hi Gergo, Congratulations, If you have got an engine with the 6port head plain HD6 Carbs without the cold start extra carb should be right. For early 2port heads H4 without the cold start are right.; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00457.html (7,617 bytes)
219. Re: [Healeys] 2.6 engine rebuild (score: 1): Author: <Josef.Eckert@t-systems.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 07:51:47 +0100; here in continental Europe we can realise its going different to your opinion. A 100/6 is more worth with an original 2.6 engine, than with a 2.9 engine. Also owners go back to drum brakes in the fr; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00491.html (9,865 bytes)
220. [Healeys] Merry Christmas (score: 1): Author: <Josef.Eckert@t-systems.com>; Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 10:01:27 +0100; A very Merry Christmas to all of you. Have a peaceful Christmas and All the Best for the New Year. Josef Eckert Konigswinter/Germany _______________________________________________ Healeys@autox.team; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00526.html (6,569 bytes)

Current List: 201 - 220
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]