Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:SVPViper@aol.com: 77 ]

Total 77 documents matching your query.

1. Paging Marcus Meredith (score: 1)
Author: SVPViper@aol.com
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 13:46:43 -0400
Anyone have his email or phone info? Thanks! Dave Schotz /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Partial archives at ht
/html/autox/2002-10/msg00020.html (6,369 bytes)

2. Updated Shock Rule Proposal (score: 1)
Author: SVPViper@aol.com
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 13:48:25 -0400
Hey Guys & Gals... located on the SCCA.org site... is the updated meeting from the SEB... discussing Stock Class shock changes... I posted my feelings/concerns located here... http://www.sccaforums.c
/html/autox/2002-06/msg00340.html (8,068 bytes)

3. Re: RE: re: 10 year Stock maximum (score: 1)
Author: SVPViper@aol.com
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 13:24:49 -0400
Just what it would have done to a 1985 Civic... still winning a class! ;-) I mean... that car is coming up on 20 years old... now luckily through continual class changes, the car didn't 'dominate' fo
/html/autox/2002-05/msg00006.html (8,479 bytes)

4. =?ISO-8859-1?B?UmU6IFJlOiCgMTAgeWVhciBNYXhpbXVtIEFnZSBmb3IgU3Rv (score: 1)
Author: SVPViper@aol.com
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 15:10:01 -0400
Leland, Thanks for the reminder! When I started Auto X my vehicle was like 10 years old... and a TRUCK! :eek: And I wouldn't have stayed or grown with the sport had they not had a place for me to com
/html/autox/2002-05/msg00010.html (9,159 bytes)

5. Re: Re: 10 year Maximum Age for Stock Class (was Reclassing) (score: 1)
Author: SVPViper@aol.com
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 23:27:32 -0400
Only 20% of the cars at Nationals were older than 10years.. and 2 had National Championships. I was just looking for conveersation, to get an impression of our membership. Hoping to see that if we we
/html/autox/2002-05/msg00023.html (10,628 bytes)

6. Re: Re: 10 year Maximum Age for Stock Class (was Reclassing) (score: 1)
Author: SVPViper@aol.com
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 23:31:58 -0400
Money spent on a car is all up to the owners... When I won Both the Pro Solo National Championship in GS and Solo 2 National Championship in GS in 1997... Our MX-6 was on STOCK Shocks!! We are talkin
/html/autox/2002-05/msg00024.html (11,961 bytes)

7. Re: Re: Stock Class Model Year Exclusion (score: 1)
Author: SVPViper@aol.com
Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 12:56:54 -0400
Since I started the thread about 10years and newer... I am taking this directed towards me... I sincerely hope it isn't... I only mentioned the 10 year rule out of discussion... and ideas... I don't
/html/autox/2002-05/msg00058.html (10,914 bytes)

8. Re: re: Stock Class Model Year Exclusion (score: 1)
Author: SVPViper@aol.com
Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 14:45:43 -0400
Dave, I am not talking even about shocks... just what it costs to run a car nationally every year... meaning that in relation to spending 3 or 4 thousand a year to compete across the country... a $7
/html/autox/2002-05/msg00075.html (9,805 bytes)

9. Re: Houston Results?? (score: 1)
Author: SVPViper@aol.com
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 17:29:27 -0400
Don't know if someone already responded, but I posted them here... http://www.sccaforums.com/cgi-bin/forumdisplay.cgi?action=topics&forum=SCCA+Results&number=6&DaysPrune=30&LastLogin= Dave, My next f
/html/autox/2002-04/msg00144.html (7,016 bytes)

10. Re: Re: reclassing (score: 1)
Author: SVPViper@aol.com
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 16:25:04 -0400
Although... again the argument needs to stay focused... on just because Bob can't do it... doesn't mean the car gets moved to a different class... Noone could do it in a Saleen Mustang either... does
/html/autox/2002-04/msg00451.html (8,047 bytes)

11. Re: Re: reclassing (score: 1)
Author: SVPViper@aol.com
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 19:40:12 -0400
Scott Wrote... "Chances are Bob WILL do it before the years over....fyi, the NA Saleen Mustang is in AS I think...." Scott... you are right... what I was trying to say... is it clearly cannot compete
/html/autox/2002-04/msg00456.html (10,168 bytes)

12. Re: Re: reclassing (score: 1)
Author: SVPViper@aol.com
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 19:50:44 -0400
No... true.. but come on... I am down like 70 Cubic Inches... and have no TQ down low... Shoot... Why would you complain... you aren't having trouble beating all aluminum LS1's! ;) Last thing you are
/html/autox/2002-04/msg00457.html (10,594 bytes)

13. Re: re: 10 year Stock maximum (score: 1)
Author: SVPViper@aol.com
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 00:27:23 -0400
David, I agree... I just was curious how people felt about this... now I sure know!! Maybe a 15 or 20 year rule... if people are for that... something to lend itself to continued change... which I th
/html/autox/2002-04/msg00469.html (8,411 bytes)

14. Re: Ok, This is how we deal with the shock issue (score: 1)
Author: SVPViper@aol.com
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 11:45:08 EST
Yeah... I guess my deal with this is exactly what Mark is saying... if it is a predetermined list... it is all in the wording... which can easily sway people to choose things that may 'sound' good...
/html/autox/2002-03/msg00331.html (12,870 bytes)

15. Re: 2002 Tirerack Banner (score: 1)
Author: SVPViper@aol.com
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 15:26:34 EST
We have this posted here... http://www.sccaforums.com/ubb/Forum2/HTML/000639.html It loos to be an old decal... being used temporarily until the new decal is ready. Hopefully by the Tour... maybe not
/html/autox/2002-02/msg00394.html (8,084 bytes)

16. Re: Volk wheels (score: 1)
Author: SVPViper@aol.com
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 16:23:25 EST
Alan... I haven't posted anything for your wheels... but thought this could be some of the reason... "The asking price for the base car is $13,500, $16,000 for the car with everything but the Volks a
/html/autox/2002-01/msg00235.html (8,647 bytes)

17. Re: 2001 "Solo Stats" is out (score: 1)
Author: SVPViper@aol.com
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 17:43:29 EST
Very Nice! You can feel free to post this on www.SCCAForums.com as well (If you haven't already) Have a great weekend! Dave Schotz /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net
/html/autox/2002-01/msg00291.html (9,832 bytes)

18. Re: New cobra classing (score: 1)
Author: SVPViper@aol.com
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 18:28:15 EST
There are some significant negatives to this new car if true however... Full Details will be offered Feb 6th... However it seems that although it is the 4V motor, with IRS... and has a 6spd... a few
/html/autox/2002-01/msg00460.html (9,164 bytes)

19. Re: Does someone have Guy Ankeny's email address? (score: 1)
Author: SVPViper@aol.com
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 16:05:37 EDT
I don't have it off hand... but he has an add on www.SCCAForums.com and it has a link to his company page... and an email link. Hope this helps!! Dave /// autox@autox.team.net mailing list /// /// To
/html/autox/2001-10/msg00211.html (7,804 bytes)

20. RE: How about 93? WAS 100+ octane unleaded @ Topeka (score: 1)
Author: SVPViper@aol.com
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 18:46:57 EDT
The Amoco on Topeka Blvd is 92... where is the one with 93 Octane? Atleast the Topeka Blvd was 92 the last 5 years. That would be nice though!! Dave Schotz My next favorite place: www.SCCAForums.com
/html/autox/2001-09/msg00067.html (8,667 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu