Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\&\#\!\?\+\*\s+help\s+needed\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\&\#\!\?\+\*\s+help\s+needed\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. &#!?+* help needed (score: 1): Author: "Martin Sukey" <mjsukey@eriecoast.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 20:46:54 -0500; Ok, I need somebody to tell me what I am doing wrong. I have been trying to post an update on the shirt project for the last two days and it will not go through. I created it in a Word document becau; /html/fot/2005-03/msg00016.html (7,696 bytes)
2. Re: &#!?+* help needed (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 02:20:10 -0600; Okay, I got your original shirt message sent at 5:24 pm. It came through. This may be a longshot, but what the hey. I was having the same problem -- my messages were not coming through. Then I notice; /html/fot/2005-03/msg00023.html (9,150 bytes)
3. RE: &#!?+* help needed (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <ryoung@navcomtech.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 00:40:29 -0800; You could always try a different email program ... Outlook Express is generally regarded as one of the worst ones available. "Block Sender" is just about useless anyway, since any spammer worth the; /html/fot/2005-03/msg00024.html (7,423 bytes)
4. Re: &#!?+* help needed (score: 1): Author: "kas kastner" <kaskas@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 07:56:51 -0800; You an block a great deal of the span by going to Message, and under create message rules list a few words the spammers use all the time , such as, Mortgage, low rate, sports movie, etc. -- Original; /html/fot/2005-03/msg00027.html (7,798 bytes)
5. Re: &#!?+* help needed (score: 1): Author: WEmery7451@aol.com; Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 15:02:54 EST; << Block Sender" is just about useless anyway, since any spammer worth the name will use a different email address every time. >> That is why you just put in his domain (part after the @ symbol). "Sm; /html/fot/2005-03/msg00028.html (7,769 bytes)
6. Re: &#!?+* help needed (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 18:59:28 -0600; Which is why I don't bother. Besides, the subject lines have become so predictable it is easy to recognize span and delete -- click-click-click --R; /html/fot/2005-03/msg00029.html (7,971 bytes)
7. RE: &#!?+* help needed (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 19:06:39 -0800; Count your blessings folks, my email address is exposed to the web--one of the costs of doing business. Today I got 91 spam messages. That was a light day. Fortunately I get everything through my com; /html/fot/2005-03/msg00030.html (9,521 bytes)
8. RE: &#!?+* help needed (score: 1): Author: "Brad Eells" <bradlnss@lightspeed.net>; Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 20:03:29 -0800; Hi Gang, I use Earthlink cable broadband and have used their 'Spamblocker' product for about a year now. The high security setting will only allow Email from addresses I approve. Everything else drop; /html/fot/2005-03/msg00031.html (7,492 bytes)
9. RE: &#!?+* help needed (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 20:18:27 -0800; That's a method called "challenge-response". It's good, but it's not for everybody. Unless you're willing to page through all the suspect stuff, you'll miss legitimate email from people not on your l; /html/fot/2005-03/msg00032.html (7,828 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]