Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+What\s+Cam\?\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

1. [Healeys] What Cam? (score: 1)
Author: "rrengineer @dslextreme.com" <rrengineer@dslextreme.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:23:45 -0800
Thanks to Doug I have the specs for the 100S cam which I am told is the same as the 100M cam, but after reading some discussions on the list about cams and flywheel lightening I am not sure what to d
/html/healeys/2009-02/msg00514.html (8,704 bytes)

2. Re: [Healeys] What Cam? (score: 1)
Author: Alan Seigrist <healey.nut@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:32:57 +0800
For reasons I won't get into, I ended up putting H6 carbs on my stock BN1 motor. The result was improved power and improved mileage! 25+ mpg! I think the M cam will improve horsepower about 10% and
/html/healeys/2009-02/msg00515.html (9,843 bytes)

3. Re: [Healeys] What Cam? (score: 1)
Author: "rrengineer @dslextreme.com" <rrengineer@dslextreme.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:37:34 -0800
Sounds like the carbs and the cam cancel each other out as far as mileage Mike _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html Healeys@autox.team.net
/html/healeys/2009-02/msg00518.html (10,502 bytes)

4. Re: [Healeys] What Cam? (score: 1)
Author: "Greg Lemon" <glemon@neb.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:15:13 -0600
I rebult my hundred motor to M spec including increasing the compression ratio from the stock 7.5/1 to 8.5, the only thing I did not do was go with the bigger M carbs, used an M cam. I got better gas
/html/healeys/2009-02/msg00523.html (8,329 bytes)

5. Re: [Healeys] What Cam? (score: 1)
Author: Bob Spidell <bspidell@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:22:34 +0000 (UTC)
Dang, that's a heavy cam!!! ;) bs I rebult my hundred motor to M spec including increasing the compression ratio from the stock 7.5/1 to 8.5, the only thing I did not do was go with the bigger M carb
/html/healeys/2009-02/msg00525.html (8,653 bytes)

6. Re: [Healeys] What Cam? (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Salter" <msalter@precisionsportscar.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:01:07 -0500
BIG lifters I guess!!! Michael Salter 100 (1953) #174 AHX12 (1953) Bugeye (1961) http://www.netbug.net/blogmichael/?p=432 --Original Message-- From: healeys-bounces@autox.team.net [mailto:healeys-bou
/html/healeys/2009-02/msg00526.html (9,315 bytes)

7. Re: [Healeys] What Cam? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed's Shop" <shop@justbrits.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:25:41 -0600
<<Dang, that's a heavy cam!!! >> STRANGER yet Bob, a Sprite cam is about TWO (2) pounds!!! HOW did a 100 4 banger cam GAIN 38 pounds?!?!?!?!? Enquiring minds REALLY need........... Anon _____________
/html/healeys/2009-02/msg00541.html (7,840 bytes)

8. Re: [Healeys] What Cam? (score: 1)
Author: "Greg Lemon" <glemon@neb.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:28:30 -0600
Should have said "flywheel" I know you guys know it, but you are just having too much fun to stop aren't you.... Greg _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.
/html/healeys/2009-02/msg00542.html (7,759 bytes)

9. Re: [Healeys] What Cam? (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ewald <richard.ewald@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:29:14 -0800
Too many deserts, and not enough exercise. _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html Healeys@autox.team.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listi
/html/healeys/2009-02/msg00543.html (7,716 bytes)

10. Re: [Healeys] What Cam? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed's Shop" <shop@justbrits.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:42:36 -0600
<<Should have said "flywheel" I know you guys know it, but you are just having too much fun to stop aren't you....>> Nah Greg, shirley you jest !!!! _______________________________________________ Su
/html/healeys/2009-02/msg00544.html (7,811 bytes)

11. Re: [Healeys] What Cam? (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ewald <richard.ewald@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:50:08 -0800
He's not jesting, and stop calling him Shirley. _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html Healeys@autox.team.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/l
/html/healeys/2009-02/msg00545.html (8,476 bytes)

12. Re: [Healeys] What Cam? (score: 1)
Author: Bob Spidell <bspidell@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:30:06 -0800
Slow news day. -- ** Bob Spidell San Jose, CA bspidell@comcast.net Failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently. - Henry Ford ** _______________________________________________ Supp
/html/healeys/2009-02/msg00548.html (8,473 bytes)

13. Re: [Healeys] What Cam? (score: 1)
Author: Alan Seigrist <healey.nut@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:52:31 +0800
True, today they're only talking about spending 20 billion of your money to bail out our beloved car industry for doing such a crap job over the last 20 years. I'd like to get a couple billion for be
/html/healeys/2009-02/msg00549.html (8,203 bytes)

14. Re: [Healeys] What Cam? (score: 1)
Author: Oudesluys <coudesluijs@chello.nl>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:07:14 +0100
With the mods you already did it is best to fit the hotter cam as wel. Yes, you will be in the higher rev range, not only because of the camshaft but also because of the larger carbs and better flow
/html/healeys/2009-02/msg00553.html (10,264 bytes)

15. Re: [Healeys] What Cam? (score: 1)
Author: "rrengineer @dslextreme.com" <rrengineer@dslextreme.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:55:16 -0800
that certainly does not sound like very much weight to remove from the flywheel. Mike _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html Healeys@autox.t
/html/healeys/2009-02/msg00555.html (10,743 bytes)

16. Re: [Healeys] What Cam? (score: 1)
Author: "rrengineer @dslextreme.com" <rrengineer@dslextreme.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:36:34 -0800
I just got off the phone with David Nock and he suggested a Dennis Welch 15 pound flywheel. As an alternative, the 100-6 flywheel is also to be considered. According to David, the difference is start
/html/healeys/2009-02/msg00572.html (8,062 bytes)

17. Re: [Healeys] What Cam? (score: 1)
Author: Oudesluys <coudesluijs@chello.nl>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:27:51 +0100
This is odd, as the rpm will come down faster so shifting down should be faster as well. Kees Oudesluijs NL rrengineer @dslextreme.com schreef: _______________________________________________ Support
/html/healeys/2009-02/msg00573.html (9,411 bytes)

18. Re: [Healeys] What Cam? (score: 1)
Author: "Mirek Sharp" <m.g.sharp@sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:22:18 -0500
That was always my understanding too - less rotating mass should translate to more responsiveness and revs should rise and fall faster. I am finding this thread interesting as I am contemplating a li
/html/healeys/2009-02/msg00574.html (10,613 bytes)

19. Re: [Healeys] What Cam? (score: 1)
Author: "rrengineer @dslextreme.com" <rrengineer@dslextreme.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:46:21 -0800
I said the same ting to David, that I thought it would drop rpm faster because of less rotational mass. Granted, he has a 6 cylinder car, but he swears that is what happens with his car. Mike _______
/html/healeys/2009-02/msg00576.html (9,706 bytes)

20. Re: [Healeys] What Cam? (score: 1)
Author: Alan Seigrist <healey.nut@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:07:45 +0800
All I have to say is using your brass synchros to spin up your big fat Austin motor & rotating mass on a downshift is not a very smart way to drive a Healey. Better to just use your brakes and change
/html/healeys/2009-02/msg00577.html (10,677 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu