- 1. [oletrucks] A Gentle Suggestion (score: 1)
- Author: Hudson29@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 19:19:36 EST
- For the last month or so I have continuously been several days to a week behind on my oletruck digests, and in my hurry to catch up noticed that I have been spending an inordinant amount of time scro
- /html/oletrucks/2000-02/msg00312.html (10,142 bytes)
- 2. Re: [oletrucks] A Gentle Suggestion (score: 1)
- Author: "Don Simmons" <tasimmons@cbnn.net>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 19:29:03 -0800
- Good point and very nicely made. Thanks,Don Simmons oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
- /html/oletrucks/2000-02/msg00315.html (7,509 bytes)
- 3. Re: [oletrucks] A Gentle Suggestion (score: 1)
- Author: "Deve Krehbiel" <dkrehbiel@kscable.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 22:06:23 -0600
- Relevant points with one left out.. reply at the TOP of the post rather than after it. With 100+ emails a day, its so much nicer when we do that. Another annoyance.. digest subscribers who whine abou
- /html/oletrucks/2000-02/msg00316.html (8,255 bytes)
- 4. Re: [oletrucks] A Gentle Suggestion (score: 1)
- Author: jelerath@us.ibm.com
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 09:30:32 -0700
- What's a good point? If the original message is not included the others may have no idea what you are talking about. You might as well not send the message to the list. Jon Elerath jelerath@us.ibm.co
- /html/oletrucks/2000-02/msg00323.html (8,009 bytes)
- 5. Re: [oletrucks] A Gentle Suggestion (score: 1)
- Author: MLayton324@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 12:40:13 EST
- i agree with jon oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
- /html/oletrucks/2000-02/msg00325.html (7,390 bytes)
- 6. Re: [oletrucks] A Gentle Suggestion (score: 1)
- Author: "G. Simmons" <gls@4link.net>
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 09:37:38 -0800
- I think the idea is not that you should make no reference to the prior message, but rather that you should excerpt the relevant portions only, so that messages do not expand to unwieldy lengths. Reg
- /html/oletrucks/2000-02/msg00326.html (7,866 bytes)
- 7. Re: [oletrucks] A Gentle Suggestion (score: 1)
- Author: Grant Galbraith <trks@javanet.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 14:23:13 -0500
- You agree with jon on what? Grant oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
- /html/oletrucks/2000-02/msg00327.html (7,519 bytes)
- 8. Re: [oletrucks] A Gentle Suggestion (score: 1)
- Author: jelerath@us.ibm.com
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 14:09:02 -0700
- My point exactly......the original message needs to be included. Jon Elerath jelerath@us.ibm.com Grant Galbraith <trks@javanet.com>@autox.team.net on 02/11/2000 11:23:13 AM Please respond to Grant Ga
- /html/oletrucks/2000-02/msg00328.html (8,061 bytes)
- 9. RE: [oletrucks] A Gentle Suggestion (score: 1)
- Author: MIKE RAHL <MRAHL@martinmartin.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 14:26:47 -0700
- Not the whole message....just the relevant parts. <My point exactly......the original message needs to be included. < oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
- /html/oletrucks/2000-02/msg00329.html (7,487 bytes)
- 10. Re: [oletrucks] A Gentle Suggestion (score: 1)
- Author: Passnb4U@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 17:11:11 EST
- What I find interesting about this discussion, and others like it I've read in different areas on the Net, is they (discussions) always center around one of two things....a "waste of bandwidth" and p
- /html/oletrucks/2000-02/msg00330.html (7,827 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu