Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Smaller\s+of\s+the\s+small\s+blocks\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Smaller\s+of\s+the\s+small\s+blocks\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] Smaller of the small blocks (score: 1): Author: "Spencer" <wits_end@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 17:44:41 -0800; Hi, All. I recently picked up a 305 for my '55 1st Series Chevy, then began wondering if it was the engine I really wanted. I'm planning on running a 700R4 tranny and the stock 3:90 rear end and defi; /html/oletrucks/2003-02/msg00265.html (8,077 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] Smaller of the small blocks (score: 1): Author: mark@noakes.com; Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 19:14:20 -0800 (PST); The 302 was a special engine for the early Z28 Camaros; the displacement had to do with racing restrictions for Trans Am at the time. It was a high revving high performer. Real ones are scarce and $$; /html/oletrucks/2003-02/msg00269.html (9,534 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] Smaller of the small blocks (score: 1): Author: "Dean Stoops" <67gto@myvine.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 22:43:50 -0500; Chevy used that combination (305 700R4) in quite a few of their pickups. I believe the the 305 has a longer stroke than any of the other small displacement engines you mentioned. A long stroke means; /html/oletrucks/2003-02/msg00271.html (9,230 bytes)
4. Re: [oletrucks] Smaller of the small blocks (score: 1): Author: "Don" <ppm@accesscomm.ca>; Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 22:24:11 -0800; I have had good luck with a 305 in an 86 Caprice wagon that I use to trailer, tow-bar and haul parts for my ole trucks. 450,000 kilometers or 280,000 miles. Will use 1 quart oil @2000 miles, runs str; /html/oletrucks/2003-02/msg00272.html (10,727 bytes)
5. Re: [oletrucks] Smaller of the small blocks (score: 1): Author: "Pat Cossey" <ccossey@seark.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 22:46:50 -0600; The 302 can be built with a crank from a 283 with a 350 block destroking the 350 to 302 cubes. If you are after power with this combo you will need the right heads and cam setup. Also they ran high c; /html/oletrucks/2003-02/msg00273.html (11,419 bytes)
6. Re: [oletrucks] Smaller of the small blocks (score: 1): Author: <kpierce@copper.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 22:40:34 -0600; Ok. If the following has errors, someone correct me: 267 has 3.1 inch crankshaft stroke and 3.5 inch bore. 283 has 3 inch crankshaft stroke and 3.875 (3 7/8) inch bore. 302 has 3 inch crankshaft stro; /html/oletrucks/2003-02/msg00274.html (11,512 bytes)
7. Re: [oletrucks] Smaller of the small blocks (score: 1): Author: "Spencer" <wits_end@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 22:43:33 -0800; Thanks, everyone. Your personal experience and technical knowhow is exactly what I was hoping for. The reason I first thought about the 305 and the 700R4 is because my dad's '84 1/2 ton has that comb; /html/oletrucks/2003-02/msg00275.html (18,547 bytes)
8. Re: [oletrucks] Smaller of the small blocks (score: 1): Author: kevin.s.brown@gm.com; Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 07:48:08 -0600; It also depends which version of an engine that you get. I'm putting a 305 in my '51 that is the HO version from an '84 Camaro. It came with 58cc heads that raised the compressions and substantially; /html/oletrucks/2003-02/msg00278.html (10,462 bytes)
9. [oletrucks] Smaller of the small blocks (score: 1): Author: Roger.Gleason@uconn.edu; Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 14:05:04 -0500; I will take exception to that remark! :-) We have a 307 in our 1/2 ton 73 with 3/4 ton rear end and HD suspension. We tow the 3000 lb. race car with 1500 lb. trailer and spare tire rack full. A load; /html/oletrucks/2003-02/msg00283.html (9,460 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]