- 1. Re: Car Class (score: 1)
- Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>
- Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 23:31:22 -0600
- First, determine whether Rotus Cars are eligible for the "modified-production" classes. I don't have a current book, but the latest one I have lists Lotus and Westfield, but not Rotus, Dutton, Birkin
- /html/autox/2001-03/msg00062.html (7,593 bytes)
- 2. Re: Car Class (score: 1)
- Author: "Jan Schmidt" <jschmidt@kumc.edu>
- Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2001 09:24:14 -0600
- I think you are a little confused , here. The cars have to be legit for "Prepared", certainly not "Modified". You dont think for a minute that the Model A or Ron Fliers Europa are production vehicle
- /html/autox/2001-03/msg00068.html (8,159 bytes)
- 3. Re: Car Class (score: 1)
- Author: Joe Worsley <worsley@yadtel.net>
- Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2001 11:53:53 -0500
- Last years rule book specifically mentioned the Rotus along with the Lotus. I just didn't read enough (or know enough or have enough patience) about the mod classes to find all the info I needed. the
- /html/autox/2001-03/msg00071.html (9,144 bytes)
- 4. Re: Car Class (score: 1)
- Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>
- Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 12:06:29 -0600
- --Original Message-- From: Joe Worsley <worsley@yadtel.net> To: Jan Schmidt <jschmidt@kumc.edu> Cc: pethier@isd.net <pethier@isd.net>; autox@autox.team.net <autox@autox.team.net>; roadsterboy@earthli
- /html/autox/2001-03/msg00080.html (7,446 bytes)
- 5. Re: Car Class (score: 1)
- Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>
- Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 12:03:32 -0600
- No. I know perfectly well whereof I speak. I may not have expressed myself clearly. Of course not. But they are supposed to meet, within the modification rules, the definition of being made from a pr
- /html/autox/2001-03/msg00081.html (7,692 bytes)
- 6. Car Class (score: 1)
- Author: Joe Worsley <worsley@yadtel.net>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:05:20 -0500
- Can anyone tell me what SOSO II class would a Rotus 7 with a 13B rotary engine be in. It is a 1380cc engine and I think that is multiplied by 1.4 to get the equivalent displacement 0f 1932cc. The car
- /html/autox/2001-02/msg00782.html (6,680 bytes)
- 7. Re: Car Class (score: 1)
- Author: "HEYWARD WAGNER" <h_kenyon@email.msn.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:32:48 -0500
- sounds like DM to me. Good luck.
- /html/autox/2001-02/msg00783.html (7,068 bytes)
- 8. car class (score: 1)
- Author: "HEYWARD WAGNER" <h_kenyon@email.msn.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 11:05:25 -0500
- posted for a friend: Thanks, hKw
- /html/autox/2001-02/msg00788.html (6,795 bytes)
- 9. Re: Car Class (score: 1)
- Author: Sean Minehart <mr_two_2001@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:27:54 -0800 (PST)
- The 2001 rule book puts it at a 2.0 conversion factor to make it an EM car. Unfortunately, the minimum weight for EM is 1500 pounds (w/o driver) so you would need to add weight but you would be able
- /html/autox/2001-02/msg00794.html (7,378 bytes)
- 10. Re: Car Class (score: 1)
- Author: "Scot Zediker" <roadsterboy@earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 15:04:11 -0800
- I think it's actually EM, since he has a rotary engine. And in that case, he'd need to add some weight (unless D/EM minimums include the driver). Scot
- /html/autox/2001-02/msg00799.html (7,603 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu