Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MG\'s\s+bad\s+in\s+rain\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. MG's bad in rain (score: 1)
Author: Geoffrey Gallaway <geoffeg@sloth.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 16:15:24 -0500 (EST)
I've heard that my 70 MGB GT will not be fun to drive in the rain. Can someone expound/explain? Also, anyone have a record for the shortest amount of time to take an engine out and take it apart (hea
/html/mgs/2000-03/msg00127.html (7,475 bytes)

2. Re: MG's bad in rain (score: 1)
Author: "British Sportscar Center" <mgpa@calweb.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 13:22:31 -0800
Rubbish! Unless the car has so many leaks that you get drenched inside, or such bald tires that it slides all over the place, a BGT is a delightful car in the rain. As to engine out and disassembled,
/html/mgs/2000-03/msg00128.html (8,349 bytes)

3. Re: MG's bad in rain (score: 1)
Author: Dan DiBiase <dibiase@home.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 16:25:40 -0500
Geoff, the few times I have been caught in the rain (almost every time I've driven it to work, it seems...) I have had no problems with my B Roadster (other than a little drip onto my foot from a lit
/html/mgs/2000-03/msg00129.html (7,721 bytes)

4. Re: MG's bad in rain (score: 1)
Author: James Nazarian Jr <James.Nazarian@Colorado.EDU>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 14:31:19 -0700 (MST)
I agree, I had mine out in rain/snow last night. They handle beautifully in any weather. James Nazarian '71 B roadster '71 BGT rust free and burnt orange '74 BGT going by-by soon '63 Buick 215
/html/mgs/2000-03/msg00130.html (9,015 bytes)

5. Re: MG's bad in rain (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Murphy" <k8vo@flyingbeers.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 17:47:13 -0500
Don't think I agree with that at all, my roadster is a blast to drive in the rain (hood up, of course.) The wipers and defroster (demister?) work fine, and it doesn't leak much. The handling is still
/html/mgs/2000-03/msg00134.html (8,208 bytes)

6. Re: MG's bad in rain (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas James Pokrefke, III" <pokrefke@mstar2.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 17:05:55 -0600
Reminds me of the time my best friend Jim and I went to the Mobile British Car Show. We got caught in a deluge of biblical proportions on the trip home. At one point, with water running down our legs
/html/mgs/2000-03/msg00135.html (10,099 bytes)

7. Re: MG's bad in rain (score: 1)
Author: Skye Poier <skye@ffwd.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 16:14:20 -0800
I got to drive my '66 MGB in the snow for the first time this week. I was a little nervous but it held up like the champ that it is, started no problem, and only a minimal bit of slip getting out of
/html/mgs/2000-03/msg00143.html (8,644 bytes)

8. RE: MG's bad in rain (score: 1)
Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 16:26:19 -0800
Funnest snow story, I have on a B. Mine was stuck in a parking spot in a foot of snow. I started it up, but the back right tire would spin, since the car was somewhat in a ditch. I left it running in
/html/mgs/2000-03/msg00145.html (9,007 bytes)

9. Re: MG's bad in rain (score: 1)
Author: JTPAKI@aol.com
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2000 01:07:54 EST
I am surprised others have not experienced this problem. I live in western Oregon and we get a lot of rain, real rain. The problem with the B is in heavy rain with water on the highway (motorway) an
/html/mgs/2000-03/msg00169.html (8,901 bytes)

10. Re: MG's bad in rain (score: 1)
Author: Tab Julius <tab@penworks.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2000 08:18:58 -0500
I think mine runs fine in the rain, and there's something cozy and raw about running with the pounding rain and the three little wipers and the soft dashboard glow and so forth. I like it. I think it
/html/mgs/2000-03/msg00175.html (9,839 bytes)

11. Re: MG's bad in rain (score: 1)
Author: RobMGB@aol.com
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2000 08:34:27 EST
<< The problem with the B is in heavy rain with water on the highway (motorway) and if you travel for a good distance without using the brakes they get wet and will not work for a couple of seconds u
/html/mgs/2000-03/msg00176.html (8,930 bytes)

12. MG's bad in rain (score: 1)
Author: "Brinkman, Gerardo V" <GB127167@exchange.DAYTONOH.NCR.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2000 09:29:37 -0500
In reference to the MGB's brake design in the wet. good couple I don't think this is a bad design from a MGB point of view, all the cars I have owned have exhibited this to one extent or another. My
/html/mgs/2000-03/msg00178.html (9,454 bytes)

13. Re: MG's bad in rain (score: 1)
Author: Geoffrey Gallaway <geoffeg@sloth.org>
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2000 11:17:19 -0500 (EST)
Maybe a solution to the brakes getting wet and not working in the rain would be to have air continually blowing on the front brake rotors? A small air pump (maybe like a fish tank air pump) split off
/html/mgs/2000-03/msg00183.html (8,654 bytes)

14. Re: MG's bad in rain (score: 1)
Author: "British Sportscar Center" <mgpa@calweb.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2000 09:27:31 -0800
My goodness, it's only been about 45 years that disc brakes have been standard on millions - perhaps billions by now - of production cars, many of which have to drive in rainy conditions all over the
/html/mgs/2000-03/msg00184.html (9,222 bytes)

15. Re: MG's bad in rain (score: 1)
Author: Barney Gaylord <barneymg@ntsource.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2000 13:18:20 -0600
(motorway) and if you travel for a good distance without using the brakes they get wet and will not work for a couple of seconds until the water is removed by contact. series until fairly recently to
/html/mgs/2000-03/msg00189.html (9,266 bytes)

16. Re: MG's bad in rain (score: 1)
Author: Kevin D Richards <flybirds@erols.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2000 16:56:56 -0500
Intestinally? just how do you get the brake drums into your intestines? hee hee
/html/mgs/2000-03/msg00190.html (8,065 bytes)

17. Re: MG's bad in rain (score: 1)
Author: Dan DiBiase <dibiase@home.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2000 17:19:33 -0500
Kevin, I'm not sure I want to know!!!
/html/mgs/2000-03/msg00192.html (7,680 bytes)

18. Re: MG's bad in rain (score: 1)
Author: mup1dm <mup1dm@surrey.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 00 14:21:30 +0000
When I purchased my '72 B-GT, it was located in Rochester, NY; I was living in England, and I needed the car to be in Cleveland, OH for the short time that I would have to get it titled and registere
/html/mgs/2000-03/msg00243.html (10,529 bytes)

19. Re: MG's bad in rain (score: 1)
Author: Dan DiBiase <dibiase@home.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 09:58:50 -0500
Great story, Douglas! Having lived in Rochester for 3 years (and enjoyed it greatly, especially the big BC show in Victor every year....), I have driven in several Western NY rainstorms - they can be
/html/mgs/2000-03/msg00250.html (7,929 bytes)

20. Re: MG's bad in rain (score: 1)
Author: richard <juju34@texoma.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 19:17:40 -0800
regardless of the weather...we'er driving a MG's...! ! ! ! ! thats what counts i love my cars.... all of em in the various states of repair/restoration... so whats a little water/snow, dust, gas smel
/html/mgs/2000-03/msg00564.html (8,401 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu