Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Proposed\s+Rules\s+Change\s*$/: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Proposed Rules Change (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Washburn" <washburn@dwave.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 12:17:52 -0500
Now you went and confused me again! :'/ If it does not affect CM, why is it proposed as a change in CM rules?? have it. Patrick Washburn C-Tech Trailer Cabinets Designed for the Racer Wausau, WI www.
/html/autox-cm/2001-04/msg00026.html (8,988 bytes)

22. Re: Proposed Rules Change (score: 1)
Author: Jim and Rose Ann Garry <garryj@mail.localnet.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 19:58:09 -0400
OK, here's my counter proposal. Instead of making this a Modified Category rule change, just make it a BM rule change. Leave CM out of it since it doesn't affect us. Include any other Mod class that
/html/autox-cm/2001-04/msg00028.html (10,357 bytes)

23. Re: Proposed Rules Change (score: 1)
Author: washburn <washburn@dwave.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:16:50 -0500
Ah, that would be different. Thanks for the clarification. (I'm not accustomed to following Mod class rules, or even reading them for that matter!) :) I say if BM cars have this problem, it's a good
/html/autox-cm/2001-04/msg00030.html (8,856 bytes)

24. Re: Proposed Rules Change (score: 1)
Author: Sam & Greg Scharnberg <samandgreg@qwest.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 08:32:07 -0500
I would assume that the SEB felt that there was zero performance benefit so not allow it if you want. I only have a 4 speed in the MK9 in my car, but the linkage and detent are such that it is only p
/html/autox-cm/2001-04/msg00031.html (9,183 bytes)

25. Re: Proposed Rules Change (score: 1)
Author: VDieman@aol.com
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 17:00:52 EDT
<< Folks, One of the previous messages stated this is a rule change will affect all Modified classes. Can we please keep this an issue limited to the GCR based classes BM, CM and FM. Other classes su
/html/autox-cm/2001-04/msg00032.html (10,783 bytes)

26. Re: Proposed Rules Change (score: 1)
Author: Charlie Mathews <cmathews@theramp.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 12:48:33 -0500
On the surface, this would seem to be a change with no benefit except to save transmissions. Say what you want, but I suspect that whoever proposed this spent a considerable amount of time coming up
/html/autox-cm/2001-04/msg00037.html (9,728 bytes)

27. Re: Proposed Rules Change (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 14:33:48 -0400
Well said, Charlie. Send a letter! Mark /// /// autox-cm@autox.team.net mailing list ///
/html/autox-cm/2001-04/msg00038.html (8,845 bytes)

28. Re: Proposed Rules Change (score: 1)
Author: Sam & Greg Scharnberg <samandgreg@qwest.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 14:04:00 -0500
I may be one of the few BM competitors that could care less (the Ralt is a 4sp.). When I was running my Brabham BT35, I couldn't even use first gear because I kept hitting reverse trying to get to s
/html/autox-cm/2001-04/msg00039.html (10,933 bytes)

29. Re: Proposed Rules Change (score: 1)
Author: VDieman@aol.com
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 15:45:08 EDT
<< On the surface, this would seem to be a change with no benefit except to save transmissions. Say what you want, but I suspect that whoever proposed this spent a considerable amount of time coming
/html/autox-cm/2001-04/msg00040.html (9,666 bytes)

30. Re: Proposed Rules Change (score: 1)
Author: "William H. Engle, Sr." <whesr@iglou.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 12:19:14 -0500
Once upon a time was unable to understand why SCCA rules always seemed to be so unnecessarily vague and complicated. The longer I am around the easier it is to understand. Why is it that changes with
/html/autox-cm/2001-04/msg00041.html (9,957 bytes)

31. Re: Proposed Rules Change (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 17:38:31 -0400
I hope you don't mean that as an insult. So why include CM in the proposal? Anyone who thinks that all that will result is a 3 oz weight reduction is sticking their head in the sand. Strong competito
/html/autox-cm/2001-04/msg00042.html (9,061 bytes)

32. Re: Proposed Rules Change (score: 1)
Author: "anne & greg" <gvav27@home.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 18:37:37 -0400
Just thought the list should know that the recommendation from the Mod advisory committee (MAC) is that the proposal should be reworded to exclude CMod. It might also be interesting to note that the
/html/autox-cm/2001-04/msg00043.html (8,827 bytes)

33. Re: Proposed Rules Change (score: 1)
Author: washburn <washburn@dwave.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 19:54:08 -0500
Making it affective across all Mod classes makes it CM's business by my reckoning. I respectfully ask: If it truly doesn't affect CM, then why would you oppose it's exclusion from CM? Pat /// /// aut
/html/autox-cm/2001-04/msg00044.html (8,091 bytes)

34. Re: Proposed Rules Change (score: 1)
Author: washburn <washburn@dwave.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 20:04:22 -0500
CM doesn't need the change so it can be left alone. AM, BM, DM, Thanks for the update...this makes sense to me. Pat (CM trying-to-be) Washburn My tentative FF deal has been postponed by the current o
/html/autox-cm/2001-04/msg00045.html (8,821 bytes)

35. Re: Proposed Rules Change (score: 1)
Author: Charlie Mathews <cmathews@theramp.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 10:29:09 -0500
The force is strong with one. But it appears that he has been influenced by the dark side (S2000's). Where's Yoda when you need him. Charlie Mathews PS Just kidding, glad your with the class. TRUST M
/html/autox-cm/2001-04/msg00046.html (7,929 bytes)

36. Re: Proposed Rules Change (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Washburn" <washburn@dwave.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 12:31:23 -0500
LOL. Thanks, I have already been fotunate enough to meet many wonderful people in CM. (Everyone except Boltmaker.........just kidding Mike!!!) :) :) Can't wait to be a part of a great class!! by the
/html/autox-cm/2001-04/msg00048.html (8,316 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu