- 1. Question about rear damper links... (score: 1)
- Author: "Wil Boucher" <william@greenmgb.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 23:35:11 -0700
- The rear shock links (between the damper and the spring plate) on my '69 B have me a little worried, so I thought I would send this out to ask those in the know... At the bottom of the link, the 'bol
- /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00190.html (7,939 bytes)
- 2. Re: Question about rear damper links... (score: 1)
- Author: "Telewest \(PH\)" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 09:40:57 +0100
- I think this is 'normal', which is why I remove the shock, drop-link and spring-plate as a unit when I have had to change a rear shock, and seperate the drop link from the lever-arm on the bench wher
- /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00193.html (9,037 bytes)
- 3. Re: Question about rear damper links... (score: 1)
- Author: Dan DiBiase <d_dibiase@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 10:36:33 -0700 (PDT)
- Having just finished a month-long project to replace a broken shock link on my '76 B....! I can speak with a little experience here. I don't think the bolt should rotate - the one in the replacement
- /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00205.html (8,863 bytes)
- 4. RE: Question about rear damper links... (score: 1)
- Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 10:52:15 -0700
- The damper link ball will spin in the rubber socket when it is tired. Originally the ball would be solid, but they do break free with age. It's ok to use them in this shape so long as there is no pl
- /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00207.html (7,637 bytes)
- 5. Re: Question about rear damper links... (score: 1)
- Author: David Councill <dcouncil@imt.net>
- Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2002 13:42:46 -0600
- If the bolt was fixed, it would make it too easy to remove the link. Thus, I have yet to see one that didn't turn unless it was new. In one case, I had to split the nut to get it off. But in all othe
- /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00210.html (7,637 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu