Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SCCA\s+cages\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SCCA\s+cages\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. SCCA cages (score: 1): Author: greg <gtlund@cyberspeedway.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 19:59:00 -0700; I just got through reading the fast track section on Production Car cages. This change was made to put the cage rules in the same section of the GCR as the rest of the classes. The rules were listed; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00257.html (9,071 bytes)
2. Re: SCCA cages (score: 1): Author: Dave Riddle <dave@microworks.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 23:21:41 -0700; Greg is being too modest. He is one of our tech inspectors here in the AZ; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00263.html (9,661 bytes)
3. re:SCCA cages (score: 1): Author: greg <gtlund@cyberspeedway.net>; Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 13:40:20 -0700; Dave blew my cover. Yes I am a dreaded tech inspecter but I started doing this to try to rescue tech from the dark side. I have seen some of the mistakes tech has made over the years. SCCA is focusin; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00268.html (7,837 bytes)
4. Re: SCCA cages (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 19:47:17 -0500; Correct me if I am wrong -- and BTW I agree with the change, but then I have a full width high--front-hoop cage so am not affected by the change. My perhaps faulty memory is that under the old rules; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00271.html (11,303 bytes)
5. Re:scca cages (score: 1): Author: Catpusher@aol.com; Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 01:38:48 EDT; Where have all the Hardys gone lol Or make them also race against $1500 Junk Yard RX7s, ect. Is this SCCAs way to weed out the those pesky old British cars that keep whipping up on the modern cars? B; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00272.html (7,661 bytes)
6. SCCA cages (score: 1): Author: <triumph_marx@freenet.de>; Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 10:36:06 +0200; Are simple roll bars behind the driver not allowed in SCCA? Chris; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00273.html (7,512 bytes)
7. Re: SCCA cages (score: 1): Author: fpspitfire@insightbb.com; Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 13:12:50 +0000; No they aren't...Full cages became required about '96 because of an incedent between a GT1 car and an H-Production car I believe. Now things are little different. Most production drivers of F/G/H bo; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00274.html (8,159 bytes)
8. Re:scca cages (score: 1): Author: fpspitfire@insightbb.com; Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 13:13:33 +0000; You'd be amazed how many times I've heard that question! aaron; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00275.html (8,212 bytes)
9. Re: SCCA cages (score: 1): Author: William G Rosenbach <wgrosenbach@juno.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 08:41:05 -0600; Will SCCA still allow an early SCCA car, with its log book number stamped on its rollbar, to run in a SCCA sanctioned vintage race, configured just as it was when first raced? Some years back, SCCA; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00276.html (9,639 bytes)
10. RE: SCCA cages (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 09:57:40 -0700; Here in Oregon the SCCA vintage grid is everything that shows up--one grid. I enjoy it, but I think it's a bit terrifying occasionally. The GT-1 cars are hard to get around just because they look so; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00277.html (10,779 bytes)
11. Re: SCCA cages (score: 1): Author: <triumph_marx@freenet.de>; Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:18:41 +0200; I am a bit confused. Do old TR cars run together with modern cars? Here in Germany cars with date of made before end of '61 don't need any security system. Others with an engine size below 2.000ccm n; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00278.html (12,069 bytes)
12. RE: SCCA cages (score: 1): Author: "Brad Eells" <bradlnss@lightspeed.net>; Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 10:31:51 -0700; Interesting discussion...My '62 TR4 was first prepared (as far as I can document) for racing in Pennsylvania Hillclimb Association events in 1970. The owner/driver put a full cage in at that time. Th; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00279.html (8,671 bytes)
13. Re: SCCA cages (score: 1): Author: Jerry Barr <jerrybarr@charter.net>; Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 12:42:52 -0500; Having raced with the Midwestern Council Vintage group I am going to have a new rollcage made up for my car. I have almost been punted off by a Ford Mustang and a seriously fast Corvette, It doesn't; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00280.html (11,195 bytes)
14. Re: SCCA cages (score: 1): Author: fpspitfire@insightbb.com; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:06:52 +0000; If your local SCCA region runs a Vintage group then yes you can run with any period style roll bar. The rules for SCCA vintage are pretty relaxed...both safety and car allowance. Heck...I was told I; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00282.html (10,861 bytes)
15. re:SCCA cages (score: 1): Author: fpspitfire@insightbb.com; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:27:47 +0000; Thankfully the first email I wrote out didn't go through...Greg, if you got a copy please feel free to forward it to the group...I didn't save a copy! All I'll say about the new roll cage rule is: I'; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00283.html (8,968 bytes)
16. Re: SCCA cages (score: 1): Author: "Joe Boruch" <jaboruch@netzero.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:01:23 GMT; In my TR3, I have the rear hoop as far back as it can go, without it going into the wheel wells. Here, I am still sitting under it (I am 6'3"). So the mandatory diagonal (from top corner to opposite; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00286.html (11,062 bytes)
17. Re: SCCA cages (score: 1): Author: "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 10:40:22 -0400 (EDT); If you are road racing, then the answer is NO. The GCR/PCA has very strict guidlelines as to what is acceptable and worthy of being declared "safe". So, if you plan on SCCA raod racing (and many rule; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00288.html (8,833 bytes)
18. Re: SCCA cages (score: 1): Author: <triumph_marx@freenet.de>; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:26:31 +0200; Thanks for that answer. I am just curious what the rules are in the USA. Here in Europe it is all ruled by the FIA and some national administrations. The rules are sometimes not so strict. Chris -- -; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00291.html (9,483 bytes)
19. Re: SCCA cages (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 19:28:45 -0500; I wasn't there, of course, but I have a hard time believing that a GT1, even a Roush version, took the checker before the smaller Prod cars had run half distance. The math does not add up. I race a s; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00301.html (11,431 bytes)
20. RE: SCCA cages (score: 1): Author: "Jeffery Senty" <gp89@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 19:32:48 -0500; Last year I purchased a g-prod Spitfire roller with zero roll rear suspention, rear disc brakes, ect,ect. The car had been in transformation to Runoffs quality. The previous owner didn't have time to; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00302.html (9,415 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]