Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spit\s+rear\s+road\s+spring\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Spit rear road spring (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 1997 14:25:51 -0500
In removing the road spring for general cleaning and overhaul I find that it had been in the vehicle backwards (according to the Haynes manual). The manual states that the machined edge of the main s
/html/triumphs/1997-12/msg01161.html (7,544 bytes)

2. Re: Spit rear road spring (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 1997 19:40:43 -0800
I talked with my LBC shop about this very thing before I replaced my Spitfire rear spring. We both agreed that there was just no way to tell which side was front, except to install it with the leaf c
/html/triumphs/1997-12/msg01170.html (8,520 bytes)

3. Re: Spit rear road spring (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 1997 19:55:19 -0500
Martin, I appreciate your response -- nice to know its not just me. On a 1500, you can tell the difference between the front/rear of the spring. There is a machined edge at the center of the main lea
/html/triumphs/1997-12/msg01176.html (10,061 bytes)

4. Re: Spit rear road spring (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 1997 16:48:31 -0800
Ed, This is a real "Head Scratcher". I examined the Haynes Manual, then both an early spring and a late "swing-spring". Here's what I can come up with. The only difference that is obvious in either s
/html/triumphs/1997-12/msg01179.html (9,860 bytes)

5. Re: Spit rear road spring (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 1997 20:20:46 -0500
Joe, I agree completely with your comments. None of the four leaf clamps have anything stamped on them. Albeit the nut/bolt in the leaf clamp assembly could have been changed at any time, all of the
/html/triumphs/1997-12/msg01184.html (11,001 bytes)

6. Re: Spit rear road spring (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 1997 17:55:34 -0800
Ed, What a conundrum! I think the wise thing to do is wait a little while and see if any more "sage advice" comes to light. Surely in the combined wisdom of our extinguished (oops, distinguished) gro
/html/triumphs/1997-12/msg01187.html (8,734 bytes)

7. Re: Spit rear road spring (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 1997 20:58:14 -0500
Joe, Along with anxiously awaiting learned advice from the 45 and over crowd, I have attempted to contact the PO for an historical perspective. I'll let you know as I learn. Regards, Ed
/html/triumphs/1997-12/msg01189.html (9,322 bytes)

8. Re: Spit rear road spring (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 16:54:51 -0500
On later 1500 Spits, it makes no difference which side of the spring faces forward. As a matter of fact, when the car starts taking on a list to port, the spring can be turned end-for-end to add to
/html/triumphs/1997-12/msg01269.html (9,376 bytes)

9. Re: Spit rear road spring (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 1997 10:16:07 +0500 (EST)
I'm listening, but I don't think I can shed too much more light here. I checked several factory workshop manuals, and (regarding the earlier spring) they all say something to the effect of "...the sp
/html/triumphs/1997-12/msg01305.html (9,154 bytes)

10. Re: Spit rear road spring (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 1997 07:38:13 -0800
< snip > Beyond all that, it appears to me that these springs are pretty much symmetrical!? --Andy (gee, he's a big help, huh?) ** That's pretty much been my experience. I've had them marked front on
/html/triumphs/1997-12/msg01310.html (7,592 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu