- 1. Spit rear road spring (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 1997 14:25:51 -0500
- In removing the road spring for general cleaning and overhaul I find that it had been in the vehicle backwards (according to the Haynes manual). The manual states that the machined edge of the main s
- /html/triumphs/1997-12/msg01161.html (7,544 bytes)
- 2. Re: Spit rear road spring (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 1997 19:40:43 -0800
- I talked with my LBC shop about this very thing before I replaced my Spitfire rear spring. We both agreed that there was just no way to tell which side was front, except to install it with the leaf c
- /html/triumphs/1997-12/msg01170.html (8,520 bytes)
- 3. Re: Spit rear road spring (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 1997 19:55:19 -0500
- Martin, I appreciate your response -- nice to know its not just me. On a 1500, you can tell the difference between the front/rear of the spring. There is a machined edge at the center of the main lea
- /html/triumphs/1997-12/msg01176.html (10,061 bytes)
- 4. Re: Spit rear road spring (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 1997 16:48:31 -0800
- Ed, This is a real "Head Scratcher". I examined the Haynes Manual, then both an early spring and a late "swing-spring". Here's what I can come up with. The only difference that is obvious in either s
- /html/triumphs/1997-12/msg01179.html (9,860 bytes)
- 5. Re: Spit rear road spring (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 1997 20:20:46 -0500
- Joe, I agree completely with your comments. None of the four leaf clamps have anything stamped on them. Albeit the nut/bolt in the leaf clamp assembly could have been changed at any time, all of the
- /html/triumphs/1997-12/msg01184.html (11,001 bytes)
- 6. Re: Spit rear road spring (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 1997 17:55:34 -0800
- Ed, What a conundrum! I think the wise thing to do is wait a little while and see if any more "sage advice" comes to light. Surely in the combined wisdom of our extinguished (oops, distinguished) gro
- /html/triumphs/1997-12/msg01187.html (8,734 bytes)
- 7. Re: Spit rear road spring (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 1997 20:58:14 -0500
- Joe, Along with anxiously awaiting learned advice from the 45 and over crowd, I have attempted to contact the PO for an historical perspective. I'll let you know as I learn. Regards, Ed
- /html/triumphs/1997-12/msg01189.html (9,322 bytes)
- 8. Re: Spit rear road spring (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 16:54:51 -0500
- On later 1500 Spits, it makes no difference which side of the spring faces forward. As a matter of fact, when the car starts taking on a list to port, the spring can be turned end-for-end to add to
- /html/triumphs/1997-12/msg01269.html (9,376 bytes)
- 9. Re: Spit rear road spring (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Wed, 24 Dec 1997 10:16:07 +0500 (EST)
- I'm listening, but I don't think I can shed too much more light here. I checked several factory workshop manuals, and (regarding the earlier spring) they all say something to the effect of "...the sp
- /html/triumphs/1997-12/msg01305.html (9,154 bytes)
- 10. Re: Spit rear road spring (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Wed, 24 Dec 1997 07:38:13 -0800
- < snip > Beyond all that, it appears to me that these springs are pretty much symmetrical!? --Andy (gee, he's a big help, huh?) ** That's pretty much been my experience. I've had them marked front on
- /html/triumphs/1997-12/msg01310.html (7,592 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu