- 1. Stage 2 Engine (score: 1)
- Author: PG <britishcars@shaw.ca>
- Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 23:10:11 -0700
- Hello list, I am in the design process of building a stage 2 engine and am looking for input design from anybody knowledgeable out there. The car is a 67 BJ8 but I am using the block and head from a
- /html/healeys/2006-09/msg00188.html (7,607 bytes)
- 2. Re: Stage 2 Engine (score: 1)
- Author: "Alan Seigrist Blue 100" <healey.nut@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 20:41:20 +0800
- Rather than spending the bomb on triple carbs (SU or Weber) I would focus on a longer duration cam (you can regrind), higher ratio rockers ( http://www.rockerarms.com/)& adjustable electronic igniti
- /html/healeys/2006-09/msg00191.html (9,780 bytes)
- 3. Re: Stage 2 Engine (score: 1)
- Author: "Jerry Wall" <jwbn6@netzero.net>
- Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 13:00:32 GMT
- you may want to review the article from the 60's reprinted starting on page 14 in the may '06 issue of AH magazine. all of the same principles still apply today. cheers, Jerry Wall BN6 Rowlett, Tx
- /html/healeys/2006-09/msg00192.html (6,710 bytes)
- 4. RE: Stage 2 Engine (score: 1)
- Author: PG <britishcars@shaw.ca>
- Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 09:21:37 -0700
- Hi Jerry, I can't believe I missed the article.....it's great. There were a couple of surprises in it though: 1. Stock exhaust is better than a shorter side exhaust...might be a venture effect, 2. Do
- /html/healeys/2006-09/msg00196.html (7,374 bytes)
- 5. RE: Stage 2 Engine (score: 1)
- Author: "rjh" <rjh@hockertlaw.us>
- Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 16:04:56 -0500
- 1. Stock exhaust is better than a shorter side exhaust...might be a venture effect, 2. Don't enlarge the exhaust ports, clean and polish only...might be related to the exhaust above. I understand why
- /html/healeys/2006-09/msg00204.html (8,189 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu