Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Transmissions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Transmissions\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Re: transmissions (score: 1): Author: "Dave Ahrendt" <ahrendt@epp.agfa.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 09:34:48 -0500; Keeping the stock transmission is the way for a real purist to go. If you only need first and reverse to get off and back on the trailer then you don't need the 5 speed. If I'm going to drive a coupl; /html/mgs/2005-11/msg00081.html (6,524 bytes)
2. Re: transmissions (score: 1): Author: oliver <sumton@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 06:24:05 -0800 (PST); uh, help me out here. what 5 speed are you putting i see it is expensive? but what's involved in the conversion?; /html/mgs/2005-11/msg00091.html (6,855 bytes)
3. Transmissions (score: 1): Author: Christopher Delling <saschris@flash.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 12:02:10 -0500; Thanks to all that have responded on my post regarding problems with my = rebuilt transmission. I am now trying to find a definitive answer to the following: Reviewing Moss Motors catalog, I see list; /html/mgs/1998-03/msg01892.html (7,525 bytes)
4. Transmissions (score: 1): Author: hovisa@nando.net (Allan R. Hovis); Date: Wed, 26 Jul 1995 07:53:37 -0400; Thanks, Allan; /html/mgs/1995-07/msg00365.html (7,349 bytes)
5. Re: Transmissions (score: 1): Author: "W. B. Olson" <WBOLSON@cherokee.astate.edu>; Date: Wed, 26 Jul 1995 08:53:59 CST; I betcha it would be cheaper and easier to replace the tranny with a good used one.; /html/mgs/1995-07/msg00366.html (8,044 bytes)
6. Re: Transmissions (score: 1): Author: "A. B. Bonds" <ab@vuse.vanderbilt.edu>; Date: 26 Jul 1995 10:09:56 -0500; The job of a synchro is to stick, to a cone-shaped surface on the gear driven by the mainshaft. Unsticking is not indicated. Your problem is that either your synchro surface ("teeth" or striations) i; /html/mgs/1995-07/msg00371.html (8,832 bytes)
7. Re: Transmissions (score: 1): Author: gmccann@pcug.org.au (Graham McCann); Date: Thu, 27 Jul 1995 09:39:20 +1000; Rubbish!!!!! 80W/90 gear oil is in fact thinner (less viscous) than 20W/50 engine oils. Don't be fooled by the numbers, gear oils follow a different index. If you don't believe me I will send you th; /html/mgs/1995-07/msg00381.html (8,318 bytes)
8. Re: Transmissions (score: 1): Author: "A. B. Bonds" <ab@vuse.vanderbilt.edu>; Date: 27 Jul 1995 10:25:24 -0500; OK, guys, a gentlemanly challenge from Oz. Fact: All standard (factory) reference manuals state unambiguously that the recommended lube for an MG tranny (TD, TF, A, B) is 30 weight motor oil. Fact: A; /html/mgs/1995-07/msg00392.html (8,889 bytes)
9. Re: Transmissions (score: 1): Author: Eric Lund <ecwink@u.washington.edu>; Date: Thu, 27 Jul 1995 10:02:19 -0700 (PDT); I hate to get started on this "what weight oil to use in the gearbox" controversy, but my owners manual (73 MGB with OD) says to use 20W50. Can anyone really, truely, unequivically, get to to bottom; /html/mgs/1995-07/msg00395.html (7,554 bytes)
10. Re: Transmissions (score: 1): Author: wzehring@cmb.biosci.wayne.edu (Will Zehring); Date: Thu, 27 Jul 1995 13:18:30 +0500; I'm aware of the differences of opinion on the net regarding this (how could I not?). Well recognized lbc specialists such as John Twist insist upon avoiding 80/90W. Some experienced owners, such as; /html/mgs/1995-07/msg00397.html (8,973 bytes)
11. Re: Transmissions (score: 1): Author: jhoward@argus.lowell.edu (James D. Howard II); Date: Thu, 27 Jul 95 11:54 MST; Yes. This is one of those issues, like silicone brake fluid vs. DOT4, and paint X vs. paint Y, which you have to decide yourself. For the record, my MGB transmission has 20W-50 and 150,000 miles, an; /html/mgs/1995-07/msg00399.html (8,017 bytes)
12. Re: Transmissions (score: 1): Author: DamitDick@aol.com; Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 00:01:34 -0400; A. B. Bonds has got my vote! I believe that good old 30W is the only way to I tried running Castrol 20/50 in my rebuilt all sychro w/overdrive. Made it shift in an out of its own accord. Replaced it; /html/mgs/1995-07/msg00410.html (7,412 bytes)
13. Re: Transmissions (score: 1): Author: ek_john_luthy <luthy@cesd.servtech.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 02:56:48 -0400 (EDT); I've got my own opinion on the subject of what gear oil to put in the transmision. I intend to keep it to myself!!! Lex; /html/mgs/1995-07/msg00411.html (7,353 bytes)
14. Re: Transmissions (score: 1): Author: TATERRY@aol.com; Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 09:18:11 -0400; I don't wish to enter this fray, just set the record straight....the Official workshop manual for the MG TD and TF that I hold right here in my hand recommends either S.A.E. 80 or 90 for the gearbox.; /html/mgs/1995-07/msg00419.html (7,840 bytes)
15. Re: Transmissions (score: 1): Author: "W. Ray Gibbons" <gibbons@northpole.med.uvm.edu>; Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 10:30:51 -0400 (EDT); Terry, I am with you on the transmission oil issue. Because I don't know diddly squat about what oil to use, I just blindly do whatever the manufacturer says to do. As a physiologist, however, I woul; /html/mgs/1995-07/msg00424.html (8,133 bytes)
16. Re: Transmissions (score: 1): Author: TATERRY@aol.com; Date: Mon, 31 Jul 1995 12:29:40 -0400; Ray, my mama told me that grits stick to your ribs....and they would probably make a great gearbox lube too.....especially with some ham gravy over! Terry; /html/mgs/1995-07/msg00479.html (7,461 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]