Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*UJ\s+verses\s+CV\s+joints\s+$What\'s\s+the\s+main\s+difference\?$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*UJ\s+verses\s+CV\s+joints\s+$What\'s\s+the\s+main\s+difference\?$\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. UJ verses CV joints (What's the main difference?) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 10:12:50 PDT; I've seen after market half shafts advertised for the Stag with CV joints compared to the Standard UJs' What's the major difference between the two types of joints?; /html/triumphs/1999-09/msg00767.html (7,574 bytes)
2. RE: UJ verses CV joints (What's the main difference?) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 13:47:47 -0500; As I understand it: The design of CV joints allows them to operate at high angles (over 40 degrees) - enough to cope with suspension travel and some lateral movement, while providing a constant veloc; /html/triumphs/1999-09/msg00778.html (9,067 bytes)
3. Re: UJ verses CV joints (What's the main difference?) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 14:52:25 -0400charset="iso-8859-1"; Where are these shafts available? Lee Thompson '71 Stag joints two movement, operating vertically becomes the; /html/triumphs/1999-09/msg00779.html (10,187 bytes)
4. Re: UJ verses CV joints (What's the main difference?) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 12:08:56 PDT; I'm in the US, but saw them advertized in a Stag mag. in the UK. I've heard from another source that the TR6 shafts are the same. Maybe I can get a pair of them for the Stag. However, some more inves; /html/triumphs/1999-09/msg00780.html (11,937 bytes)
5. RE: UJ verses CV joints (What's the main difference?) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 14:25:58 -0500; heard I got mine from SNG Barratt in the UK. At the time, they carried a line of Stag parts although their principal business is Jaguar bits. They've sold their Stag line to Rimmer Bros, from whom I; /html/triumphs/1999-09/msg00784.html (9,427 bytes)
6. RE: UJ verses CV joints (What's the main difference?) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 12:40:38 -0700; ** Well, your close and you have most of it correct. Just one minor correction if I may. . .CV joints, by their design maintain a constant rotation with respect to the input/output regardless of the; /html/triumphs/1999-09/msg00786.html (11,505 bytes)
7. Re: UJ verses CV joints (What's the main difference?) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 14:06:33 -0500charset="iso-8859-1"; OK, I'll give it a try. First of all, when there is no misalignment between the input shaft and the output shaft, both types impart a constant angular velocity from the input shaft to the output shaf; /html/triumphs/1999-09/msg00787.html (10,814 bytes)
8. RE: UJ verses CV joints (What's the main difference?) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 14:41:25 -0700; suspension The most common type of CV joint setup (used on 80-90% of FWD econoboxes) has the 'spline' built into the inner joint. The outer 'race' is simply elongated, so the balls and inner 'race' c; /html/triumphs/1999-09/msg00789.html (9,196 bytes)
9. Re: UJ verses CV joints (What's the main difference?) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 18:52:57 -0400; I have a 1960 Berkeley T60.... front wheel drive with universal joints instead of CV's. Drive it once and you'll feel the difference. ;-) Bill Elliott Lake Mills, WI; /html/triumphs/1999-09/msg00793.html (8,043 bytes)
10. RE: UJ verses CV joints (What's the main difference?) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 07:05:41 -0500; Hi List! Question: Can these CV Joints been installed in the TR4/A IRS car? I think the set-up is the same as a TR250 & TR6. If so, then what is the distrubutor & the part #. I always associated the; /html/triumphs/1999-09/msg00821.html (8,182 bytes)
11. RE: UJ verses CV joints (What's the main difference?) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 13:15:17 +0100; one little difference, UJ's seem to be stronger by inherent design than cv's. An example are cv's and uj's for the same application in the Mini. The cooper's' shaft used to have uj's whereas the std; /html/triumphs/1999-09/msg00824.html (8,739 bytes)
12. RE: UJ verses CV joints (What's the main difference?) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:18:19 -0700; cv's. I'm not quite sure what that means, but the FWD Oldsmobile Toronado used CV joints to carry over 1000 ft-lbs of torque, and I've never heard that CV joint failures were particularly common. For; /html/triumphs/1999-09/msg00851.html (8,363 bytes)
13. RE: UJ verses CV joints (What's the main difference?) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: 19 Sep 99 22:21:41 +1200; Either type of joint can be designed for arbitary strength. The Mini inner CV joint was designed not for strength, but to be cheaper than the Hardy Spicer UJ and less likely to disolve in oil than th; /html/triumphs/1999-09/msg00918.html (8,672 bytes)
14. Re: UJ verses CV joints (What's the main difference?) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 19:42:15 -0400; So, I'm at an autocross with my '74 TR6 DSP car... I've got three year old Hoosier radial DOT tires, so I figure I ought to be able to get these babies to slide a little, if I need to "rotate" the c; /html/triumphs/1999-09/msg01127.html (9,759 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]