Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*duh\s+my\s+camshaft\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*duh\s+my\s+camshaft\s+question\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. duh my camshaft question (score: 1): Author: Terry Thompson <firespiter@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 20:04:06 -0800 (PST); And the camshaft question is; What are some of your recommendations for a streetable camshaft on an overbored block and higher (9.5:1 to 10:1) compression ratio, ported/polished head w/competition va; /html/spitfires/2001-03/msg00013.html (8,004 bytes)
2. Re: duh my camshaft question (score: 1): Author: Carter Shore <clshore@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 06:15:32 -0800 (PST); I lived with an A-6 cam in a sreet driven Spitfire for a year or so. It was a basically race prepped 1147 motor. I commuted in expressway and stop and go traffic, from the 'burbs to downtown Miami,; /html/spitfires/2001-03/msg00028.html (9,435 bytes)
3. RE: duh my camshaft question (score: 1): Author: "Graziano, Michael" <michael.graziano@csfb.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 09:29:54 -0500; I'm using a piper 285 cam that we advanced 4 degrees with a vernier gear set. Advancing it brought the power range down a little. It's a nice cam, with noticable power improvements, but I do have a; /html/spitfires/2001-03/msg00031.html (10,242 bytes)
4. RE: duh my camshaft question (score: 1): Author: Craig Smith <CraigS@iewc.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 08:37:17 -0600; I got a question along this... I had the head on my 71 shaved .030, I got to thinking about the rocker angle to the push rods. I lowered the deck of the head but I didn't do anything to the rods, do; /html/spitfires/2001-03/msg00032.html (9,863 bytes)
5. Re: duh my camshaft question (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 08:12:28 +0000; Probably not. I was prepared to cut down my pushrods on Tiny Tim when I had his engine built. It is running 10.6:1 compression ratio and I discovered that I did not have to adjust pushrod length. Joe; /html/spitfires/2001-03/msg00036.html (10,637 bytes)
6. RE: duh my camshaft question (score: 1): Author: Carter Shore <clshore@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 07:19:50 -0800 (PST); Are you using stock pushrods? Since the rocker pedestal bolts directly to the head, milling the head or block does not directly affect the geometry of the rocker arm tips with respect to the valve st; /html/spitfires/2001-03/msg00038.html (8,942 bytes)
7. Re: duh my camshaft question (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 08:17:40 +0000; Oops, That should read 11.6:1 compression ratio! Joe; /html/spitfires/2001-03/msg00039.html (7,472 bytes)
8. Re: duh my camshaft question (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 08:31:33 +0000; I'm pretty sure they are stock in length. But they are Ted Schumacher's V168 Joe; /html/spitfires/2001-03/msg00040.html (9,558 bytes)
9. RE: duh my camshaft question (score: 1): Author: Douglas Braun & Nadia Papakonstantinou <dougnad@bellatlantic.net>; Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 09:49:03 -0500; I think shimming the pedestal would fix the pushrod-to-rocker angle, but it would mess up the valve-rocker angle. Ideally you would get shorter pushrods. BTW, if you get a reground cam, it will have; /html/spitfires/2001-03/msg00045.html (8,109 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]