- 1. side marker lamp rubber update (score: 1)
- Author: jak0pab@jak10.med.navy.mil (Bowen, Patrick A. RP2)
- Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 17:27:30
- Just to keep everyone informed. I have found a company that said they can reproduce these I will not know until next Monday how much it will cost (this is the part I am afraid of). They have to figur
- /html/spitfires/1999-01/msg00078.html (7,398 bytes)
- 2. Re: side marker lamp rubber update (score: 1)
- Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 14:20:25 -0800
- My studies on those pieces indicate that you are correct. There are indeed 2 distinct molds. The right rear is the same as the left front and conversely, the left rear is the same as the right front
- /html/spitfires/1999-01/msg00083.html (8,029 bytes)
- 3. RE: side marker lamp rubber update (score: 1)
- Author: "Gambony, Jim" <jim.gambony@eds.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 16:33:23 -0600
- Does this mean the set I just "borrowed" from the local Lotus dealer won't fit my car? :-) (the lenses and chrome piece are still being used on the new Lotii Elites, don't know about the rubber piece
- /html/spitfires/1999-01/msg00084.html (8,878 bytes)
- 4. Re: side marker lamp rubber update (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Sykes <s1500@worldnet.att.net>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 18:59:50 -0800
- Although pairs of these rubber bits are *similar*, there are four distinct parts. TRF catalog shows four different part numbers. If you check the inside face (towards car) of the part, you'll see th
- /html/spitfires/1999-01/msg00089.html (7,089 bytes)
- 5. RE: side marker lamp rubber update (score: 1)
- Author: Atwell Haines <carbuff@nac.net>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 20:22:36 -0500
- The Lucas sidemarker lights used by Lotus had flat rubber bases that 1) do not conform to the body contours of the Spit and 2) do not hold the light assy at the proper angle. I know, I tried them. Th
- /html/spitfires/1999-01/msg00125.html (7,410 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu