Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+Incompatibility\s+Pertonix\s+and\s+Tach\s+conversion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+Incompatibility\s+Pertonix\s+and\s+Tach\s+conversion\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Healeys] Incompatibility Pertonix and Tach conversion (score: 1): Author: "Thomas J. Morrione" <tjmorrio@colby.edu>; Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 07:27:59 -0400; I'd appreciate it if you would elaborate a bit on the ballast/wiring problems you noted when the Pertronix ignition was combined with the electronic tach conversion. I guess I'm headed for trouble i; /html/healeys/2011-07/msg00869.html (7,897 bytes)
2. Re: [Healeys] Incompatibility Pertonix and Tach conversion (score: 1): Author: Alan Seigrist <healey.nut@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 20:02:32 +0800; If Nisonger converted your tach to negative ground, you shouldn't have any problems. Nisonger would have likely adjusted the tach for Pertronix already. Alan -- Sent from my mobile device __________; /html/healeys/2011-07/msg00870.html (9,027 bytes)
3. Re: [Healeys] Incompatibility Pertonix and Tach conversion (score: 1): Author: "Thomas J. Morrione" <tjmorrio@colby.edu>; Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 09:09:52 -0400; Alan - thanks very much that's a big relief. Nisonger did ask me to specify what the electronic system was. I'll let the list know, however, if any problem arises when I do get to setting it up. I we; /html/healeys/2011-07/msg00874.html (9,705 bytes)
4. Re: [Healeys] Incompatibility Pertonix and Tach conversion (score: 1): Author: Alan Seigrist <healey.nut@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 21:22:51 +0800; I did the neg conversion on my BJ8 and have no probs with the tach after installing pertronix. dead on. _______________________________________________ Healeys@autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.; /html/healeys/2011-07/msg00876.html (10,131 bytes)
5. Re: [Healeys] Incompatibility Pertonix and Tach conversion (score: 1): Author: Oudesluys <coudesluijs@chello.nl>; Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:59:16 +0200; I cannot elaborate much as I cannot remember exactly where the fault was. When I got my Jensen Healey some years ago the Pertronix Ignitor (LU-142A/143/144/162A/163/164/166A, one of these types) was; /html/healeys/2011-07/msg00878.html (8,911 bytes)
6. Re: [Healeys] Incompatibility Pertonix and Tach conversion (score: 1): Author: "Thomas J. Morrione" <tjmorrio@colby.edu>; Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:56:06 -0400; Many thanks for getting back to me. The details of your experience and Alan's reassurance help a lot to put the Pertronix/tach situation in perspective. I recall the list discussion about proper coi; /html/healeys/2011-07/msg00880.html (10,129 bytes)
7. Re: [Healeys] Incompatibility Pertonix and Tach conversion (score: 1): Author: David Nock <healeydoc@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 08:15:33 -0700; The deal is sometime the conversion to the electronic ignition works just fine and other times the tach reads wrong. You never know for sure what is going to happen. If the tach reads in error or is; /html/healeys/2011-07/msg00882.html (9,820 bytes)
8. Re: [Healeys] Incompatibility Pertonix and Tach conversion (score: 1): Author: Oudesluys <coudesluijs@chello.nl>; Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 17:43:45 +0200; Plug your ears when SWMBO gets nagging. Kees Oudesluijs NL [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of coudesluijs.vcf] ______________________________________________; /html/healeys/2011-07/msg00885.html (7,915 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]