Bob;
I think most of us feel we've already sunk more time and $ into
our LBC's than we'd care to admit so paying some extra for a
quality, well-fitting header wouldn't hurt my feelings any. I
mean logic left the building a long time ago, where total $ is
concerned. But what's the logic in "cheap headers"? If you're
going to build something already, our motto HAS to be "build
it RIGHT!" Does it cost more to build a header that fits than
a header that doesn't?? And while they're at it, they could
JetHot coat them for us! :-)
FWIW, IMHO
Dave Friedlander
CF25194UO
Still searching for that "right" stainless header
"Robert M. Lang" wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Jim Hurley wrote:
>
> > Hello,
>
> Hi,
>
> [stuff deleted for bevity]
>
> > First off, why is it so hard to build a header that matches up with the
> > dimension of a TR6 motor. It is great that Rimmer Bros. fixed things, but
> > it would be better if they got it right the first time.
>
> It's not hard to build a good header, it's just labor intensive. That
> translates to to expensive, and frankly not everyone wants to spend $400
> on a header despite the advantages of spending that amount.
>
> So - cheap headers cut corners to keep the costs down.
>
> It's that simple.
>
> [more stuff deleted]
>
> > Jim Hurley "Life is too short for a backfire!"
> > '75 TR6
>
> regards,
> rml
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Bob Lang Room N42-140Q | This space for rent
> Consultant MIT unix-vms-help |
> Voice:617-253-7438 FAX: 617-258-9535 |
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|