autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Shhhh! while they're busy at Nationals...

To: "Thompson, Adrian (A.L.)" <athomps9@visteon.com>, autox@autox.team.net
Subject: RE: Shhhh! while they're busy at Nationals...
From: Judy Becker <judyb@cts.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 09:15:38 -0700
OK OK
So I do hate to sound like a broken record or tape rewind gone astray, but
what 
"about the sportscars" that are 2 seaters?
Look at the cars not allowed to run & have fun in the ST classes:
MR2's, RX7s, Corvettes, Triumphs,Mustangs, etc. 
Do Miatas qualify as they do have a back seat?

I agree with the ST concept I just want to see eligible vehicle group
expanded.

Judy   in San Diego  {:>}

ps most of cars in our local ST like classes are 2 seaters & we'll be
looking         at what happens at Nationals with re: to our own classes.
At 08:44 AM 9/15/99 -0400, Thompson, Adrian (A.L.) wrote:
>Another one.  What about an MGB GT with the Rover/Buick V8.  That was sold
>in England so you can claim it's a British Leyland engine.  It's still in
>production in Range Rovers and Discoveries, enlarged with fuel injection so
>you wouldn't even need to tune it much.  Or even better drop that same
>engine in an Spridget shell.  I've seen a couple of E mod cars like that and
>a friend of mine back home (England) had one as a daily driver for a long
>time.
>
>I think this any engine from the same manufacturer is the biggest problem
>with STU.  That's what makes this almost unworkable. If it was revised to:
>
>Any Engine from the same manufacturer with the same number of cylinders and
>within 20% of the original capacity.
>
>Or something similar it might be better but it's still way to open for a
>street based classed IMHO.
>
>Adrian Thompson
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Larry Steckel [mailto:lorenzoscribe@hotmail.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 1999 11:35 PM
>To: lhheston@yahoo.com; autox@autox.team.net
>Subject: Re: Shhhh! while they're busy at Nationals...
>
>
>Try to find Hot Rod Magazine from about 1980-81.  The Chevy engineers 
>dropped a 2.8 litre V/6 into a Chevette and Hot Rod detailed the swap with 
>part numbers of engine mounts etc.  Factory parts would be a big help with 
>such a swap.
>
>
>>From: Lonnie Heston <lhheston@yahoo.com>
>>Reply-To: Lonnie Heston <lhheston@yahoo.com>
>>To: autox@autox.team.net
>>Subject: Shhhh! while they're busy at Nationals...
>>Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 20:18:33 -0700 (PDT)
>>
>>...let's think up some really good STU cars.  My
>>favorite idea so far is:
>>
>>Chevy Chevette with a Turbo'd Camaro RS 2.8v6, 10bolt
>>rear end geared for top end and itsy-bitsy rollerskate
>>style wheels.  Replace the side windows with aluminum
>>panel with fancy paint and a little bow-tie window.
>>Any tall first gear manual tranny would work, maybe
>>get 75mph in first.  Turbo lag would help prevent tire
>>spin.
>>
>>What's your idea??
>>
>>Lonnie (G-stock is no place for a 2.8 Camaro RS)
>>Heston
>>
>
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>