autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [evolution-disc.] Harness bar...

To: evolution-discussions@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [evolution-disc.] Harness bar...
From: Keith Brown <kb_solo2@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 09:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
Teh old rule had the word "Telescoping" in the harness
bar description.  Tha was removed.  But the "no other
purpose" statement remains.  But I would think a
simple bar running between the shoulder belt mounts
would not add any significant chassis stiffening, but
if you triangulate it...

Keith

--- Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com> wrote:

> Howdy,
> 
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, James Rogerson wrote:
> > Nope:
> >
> > The Hardbar harness bar ties into the "B" pillar
> of the vehicle with Grade
> > 12.9 socket head cap screws using the OEM shoulder
> harness mounting
> > locations. This bar has an additional benefit in
> that it stiffens the
> > chassis of the vehicle in torsion.
> >
> > Even though they say it is Solo II legal later on
> in the ad, the part in
> > bold above is in excess of the rules.  (no other
> purpose)
> 
> I'd have sworn I saw a clarification saying this was
> actually legal 
> somewhere...  Are you sure?  As I recall, the
> interpretation changed in 
> the last few years.
> 
> Mark






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>