Your a genius, Ms. Kelly.
Craig
--- "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com> wrote:
> First, forgive me, because I've only just now caught
> on to this thread, but
> here's the thing: if STS, or SM for that matter,
> only runs as a supplemental
> class at National events, and if we don't provide it
> at Regional events,
> we're not helping this new class exist at all at
> National events. No one's
> going to try out STS just at a National event, and I
> doubt National events
> are going to pull in any new Rookies.
>
> The only people who would give it any significant
> interest would be people
> who know of its existence, and rookies, as in people
> who've never
> autocrossed before, most certainly would not, as
> they don't get FastTrack
> every month.
>
> So, anyway, that's why I think we should offer STS
> and SM, and whatever
> other class there is. Don't we already?
>
> I just find it all really confusing, that's my
> problem.
>
> Katie
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jerry Mouton [mailto:jerry@moutons.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 11:47 AM
> > To: Bay_Area_Autocross_List
> > Subject: STS Class in SFR
> >
> >
> > After reading the FasTrack description of the
> status of STS,
> > it's clearly
> > not a National
> > class this year. Maybe next year. It will be run
> strictly as a
> > supplemental
> > class in National events.
> >
> > So there's not a requirement for SFR to run it
> Again, if there's
> > sufficient interest,
> > the people I know on the Steering Committee would
> probably vote in a
> > separate class.
> >
> > IMHO.
> >
> > Jerry
> >
> > Jerry Mouton mailto:jerry@moutons.org
> Laissez les bons temps
> > rouler!
> >
> >
>
|