ba-autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: "objectionable" sponsorship?

To: brooks@frnk.com, ba-autox@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: "objectionable" sponsorship?
From: Elmoizme@aol.com
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 21:45:48 EST
Hey Brooks,

Are you going to be tied up with these products while you're driving? That 
would be kewl cause then it would give me an advantage over you :) So if 
that's the case, I have no problems. Unless of course you get mad if I beat 
you (pun intended).

Better take off your signs when children are present though. Parents might 
not feel like explaining what bondage.com means to their kids.

Elton



In a message dated 1/17/2001 5:29:16 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
brooks@frnk.com writes:


> I have an opportunity to pick up some much-needed sponsorship cash for the
> upcoming season.  Thing is, the company is an adult web site; not strictly a
> porn site, but certainly an adults-only sex-oriented lifestyle site.  The
> name itself doesn't contain anything graphic or obscene, though the name
> clearly indicates the type of site it is.
> 
> I've scoured the rulebooks, and only found vague references to
> "objectionable" sponsors.  Is there any real policy here? Regardless of the
> technicalities, am I going to be looked at as a freak if I accept the
> sponsorship (that is, will I be looked at as more of a freak than I
> otherwise would be based on my driving)?
> 
> I could really use the equipment the cash would buy, but I don't want to
> offend people.  Any advice?
> 
> Thanks
> -Brooks

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>