It would be name only. Name/URL, since it's the same thing.
-b
ps: It's not?!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Navid Kahangi [mailto:navid@interwoven.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 6:15 PM
> To: Talley, Brooks; ba-autox@autox.team.net
> Subject: RE: "objectionable" sponsorship?
>
>
> Do you have to just mention the name, or are there graphics
> involved. If it
> is the latter, I'd say go for it! It will give you a
> competitive advantage
> too since you'll be distracting your competitors. :)
>
> --Navid
> p.s. You all don't think Interwoven.com is a porn site, do you? :)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net
> [mailto:owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net]On
> Behalf Of Talley, Brooks
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 5:30 PM
> To: 'ba-autox@autox.team.net'
> Subject: "objectionable" sponsorship?
>
> I have an opportunity to pick up some much-needed sponsorship
> cash for the
> upcoming season. Thing is, the company is an adult web site;
> not strictly a
> porn site, but certainly an adults-only sex-oriented
> lifestyle site. The
> name itself doesn't contain anything graphic or obscene,
> though the name
> clearly indicates the type of site it is.
>
> I've scoured the rulebooks, and only found vague references to
> "objectionable" sponsors. Is there any real policy here?
> Regardless of the
> technicalities, am I going to be looked at as a freak if I accept the
> sponsorship (that is, will I be looked at as more of a freak than I
> otherwise would be based on my driving)?
>
> I could really use the equipment the cash would buy, but I
> don't want to
> offend people. Any advice?
>
> Thanks
> -Brooks
|