> Guarantee we will always have under 200 entries and it's
> smooth from here to Topeka.
we've handled up to 270+ entries with the current reg system. it was
daylight that was the bottleneck then, not reg.
what id prefer is a remote electric shock system to get workers to report on
time! :) j/k, i think!
also, tech on grid tends to hold up the event because its not out of the way
before the grid forms, and we dont have the concept of 'late on grid'
anymore so people show up at the last second. so i consider the old version
to be more efficient, but also more trouble because you have to have a
separate area for tech, plus stand in line with your car.
-james
----- Original Message -----
From: <Toy4speed@aol.com>
To: <ba-autox@autox.team.net>
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:04 PM
Subject: Re: Informal Poll on "sort of" pre-reg. for autox !
> In a message dated 10/31/2001 3:46:31 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> black94pgt@pacbell.net writes:
>
>
> >
> > i agree with jerry. havent noticed a problem myself.
> >
> > -james c
> >
>
> A testimonial to all the hard work and efforts to continually evaluate a
> situation before it breaks. Sure, registration is fine. 170 entrants may
> not be the norm. Or perhaps it is, who knows ? Course workers did a very
> adequate job previously, just randomly covering parts of the course. Now
we
> have these wonderful placards with worker station numbers. Nice, simple,
> effective. Tech en masse was pretty standard when I started, now tech on
> grid is very common. Perhaps annual tech is coming. Little things, but
> effective things. Personally I like the current reg. process. It's
fairly
> relaxed, social, and most seemed content with it (unless a newbie without
a
> membership card). Guarantee we will always have under 200 entries and
it's
> smooth from here to Topeka.
>
> Don
|