datsun-roadsters
[Top] [All Lists]

Oil Testing Results

To: "Rich Glass" <dpg171@aol.com>,
Subject: Oil Testing Results
From: "datsunmike" <datsunmike@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 20:11:00 -0400
Consumer Reports Oil Testing Results
      =20
    =20


















      =20
     Consumer Reports Oil Testing Results=20
          =20
            Return to Articles Page=20
          =20
            Consumer Reports, with one of the most widely respected =
product testing laboratories in the world has just released the results =
of an extensive test on oil brands and oil changes, as well as other =
issues regarding car care. In the process, the test demolished much of =
the conventional wisdom regarding car lubrication. The two most =
surprising results: the frequency with which oil is changed doesn't =
matter after the first few oil changes on a new engine, and the type or =
brand of oil used can not be shown to make any difference.

            The testers placed freshly rebuilt engines in 75 New York =
taxis and then ran them for nearly two years, with each cab racking up =
60,000 miles, placing different brands and weights in different cars and =
changing the oil at 3,000 miles in half the cars and 6,000 in the other =
half. At the conclusion of the test period, the engines were torn down, =
measured and inspected. The conclusions: Regardless of brand of oil or =
weight, no measurable differences could be observed in engine wear. =
Furthermore, there was no difference among cars which had oil changed at =
the shorter or longer interval.

            Does this have any bearing on the enthusiast's car, which is =
given almost the opposite usage stored for long periods of time then =
started and driven for short distances? The tests suggested that our =
type of usage would build up sludge and varnish, indicating that an =
annual or semi-annual oil change is a good idea regardless of how much =
mileage the car is driven. But there is little indication that the brand =
or weight needs to be given serious consideration, and synthetic oil has =
no discernible advantage over the old stand-bys. More information on the =
tests and results can be obtained from Consumers Union or the July issue =
of Consumer Reports available at most libraries.

            Source: British Car Magazine, October-November 1996

            Related Stories:

            More Than You Ever Wanted to Know About Motor Oil

            An Excerpt from a SAE Oil Filter Test Oil filter efficency =
test and a list of filters that fit the Spitfire

            Visit the Mopar site for the study of major old filters and =
the results



--------------------------------------------------------------------
            Return to Articles Page =20

    =20

[demime 0.97c removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
premast.gif]

[demime 0.97c removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
referbut.gif]

[demime 0.97c removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
maintbut.gif]

[demime 0.97c removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
howtobut.gif]

[demime 0.97c removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
salebut.gif]

[demime 0.97c removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
clubbut.gif]

[demime 0.97c removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
funbut.gif]

[demime 0.97c removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
Magazbut.gif]

[demime 0.97c removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
otherbut.gif]

[demime 0.97c removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
siteindex.gif]

[demime 0.97c removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
returnbut.gif]

[demime 0.97c removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 
back.gif]

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>