healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Healeys] EPA Takes First Step

To: Richard Ewald <richard.ewald@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Healeys] EPA Takes First Step
From: Bob Spidell <bspidell@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:38:53 -0700
Makes sense--newer cars run much leaner.

Re: the CO2.  A good example of the 'law of unintended consequences.'  Reduce 
the HC and CO and increase the NOX--requiring a redesigned converter--and CO2.

Makes you wonder about 'global warming;' even if we're able to reduce CO2--not 
likely, given that the Chinese, Indians, etc. aren't interested in cooperating 
any more than Oakland is interested in cooperating with Berkeley--and in 20 
years all the scientists with an agenda will be raising the threat of 'the new 
ice age' (just like they did 20 years ago).


Bob


Richard Ewald wrote:
> Saying that older cars have higher CO2 emissions than new cars is just flat
> wrong.
> A non emission controlled LBC will produce smog number similar to the
> following:
> HC 1000 PPM
> CO 7%
> CO2 3-4%
> 
> An emission controlled OBDII car will produce numbers similar to the
> following:
> HC 10 PPM (or less, I have seen smog tests that register 0)
> CO 0-.1%
> CO2 13% or so.
> 
> So even if you assume a 100% conversion in the atmosphere of CO to CO2 you
> still come up short.  This is due to the hydrocarbon emissions.
> 
> I stand by my comments.
> 
> Rick

> 


-- 
*******************************************************************
Bob Spidell           San Jose, CA            bspidell@comcast.net

*******************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html

Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys


http://www.team.net/archive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>