mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Rover 3.5L, 3.9L, 4.1L?

To: "Scott Gardner" <gardner7@pilot.infi.net>
Subject: Re: Rover 3.5L, 3.9L, 4.1L?
From: mmcewen@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca (John McEwen)
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 1998 12:19:37 -0500
Hi Scott:

I would assume that these are later British versions of the original
engine, just as GM has later, larger versions of some of its V6 engines.

John


>> Was your choice of the Rover engine done because there are pieces readily
>> available to bolt it into the B or was it because you wanted to keep it all
>> Brit?.  I have thought about a couple of Buick engines which I wonder if
>> anyone has used.  I am thinking specifically about the 3.8 V6 and the 2.8
>> V6.  The old 3.8 can be a real bomb and there are lots of them around.  The
>> 2.8 was used in a rear wheel drive configuration in the Camaro and the S10
>> pickup.
>
>Speaking of Rover engines, I've seen the 3.5L mentioned all over the
>place as being a version of the Buick 215, but what are the Rover
>3.9L and 4.1L, and where would you find them?  Are they distinct
>engines used in production cars, or are they just bored and/or
>stroked versions of the 3.5L?  I know I've asked this before, I just
>can't remember the answer. (Pitfalls of being too quick to delete old
>posts.)
>        Also, I remembered seeing a web page for a company that did
>installations of Rover v-8s in early Chrome-bumpered B's, but I tried
>to find them with a search engine today and couldn't locate them.
>Anybody have any clues to what the company name might have been?
>
>Scott



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>