spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Spitfire Dealer Service Notices

To: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>,
Subject: Re: Spitfire Dealer Service Notices
From: jak0pab@jak10.med.navy.mil (Bowen, Patrick A)
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1998 12:45:35
Joe,  Thanks for the great info!  I am very interested in the Triumph
Factory Service notices, where by chance did you happen to come across
them.  Maybe these are something that could be put on the web.  I imagine
they are an incredible resource.  How many are there?  I am just too
interested in this.

Patrick Bowen

At 08:55 PM 8/19/98 -0700, Joe Curry wrote:
>Yesterday I was over at a friend's house and we were looking through an
>old notebook of Triumph Factory Service Notices for dealers.
>
>As he read off the headings (I left my glasses at home so he was reading
>for both of us) I stopped him when he got to one that was titled,
>"Spitfire Rear Brake Hoses".  I said, "Wait, let see if I can guess what
>it says."  My theory was it referred to the tendency of the rear hoses
>to rub against the axle shafts and wear the hoses, causing a very unsafe
>condition.  Sure enough, I was correct.  
>
>The notice calls for each car that is in the shop for any service to
>have the rear hoses checked for flat spots caused by wear.  Then with
>the suspension in both up and down extremes check for clearance from the
>shaft.  Improper clearance is to be corrected by adjusting the attaching
>points of the hose brackets.
>
>I noticed some time ago that both mine and my sons Spits exhibited the
>problem.  I corrected mine by replacing the hoses with braided stainless
>ones and on my son's car by taking some of the springs from a pair of
>front hoses and mounting them on the rear hoses.  That way, if the hose
>tries to contact the axle, the spring will rub and not the rubber hose.
>
>But the real purpose of this message is to have everybody check those
>hoses at the first opportunity.
>
>Regards,
>Joe Curry 
>-- 
>"If you can't excel with talent, triumph with effort."
>
> -- Dave Weinbaum in National Enquirer
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>